2020
DOI: 10.3390/jmse8090715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Adaptation to Beach Loss Due to Climate Change in Japan

Abstract: To measure economic effects of changes in environmental quality caused by climate change in Japan, we estimate beach loss damage costs in Japan and in each prefecture and evaluate the economic effectiveness of hypothetical adaptation measures to restore sandy beaches. For analyses, we use a computable general equilibrium model (CGE) that integrates a utility function with environmental quality factors as an independent variable derived from a recreation demand function in a travel cost method (TCM). We use fut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of these studies conclude that the introduced planned adaptation measures can mitigate the negative impact of climate change at low cost (Hoffmann, 2019; Robinson et al , 2012; Zeshan and Ko, 2019; Zeshan and Shakeel, 2020) or receive net benefits (Calzadilla et al , 2014; Nakajima et al , 2020; Schenker and Stephan, 2014). Some studies point out that the examined adaptation measures may not be sufficient to solve the problem although helpful (Akune et al , 2015; Arndt et al , 2015; Boyd and Ibarrarán, 2009; Elshennawy et al , 2016; Ouraich et al , 2019; Zidouemba, 2017).…”
Section: Review Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of these studies conclude that the introduced planned adaptation measures can mitigate the negative impact of climate change at low cost (Hoffmann, 2019; Robinson et al , 2012; Zeshan and Ko, 2019; Zeshan and Shakeel, 2020) or receive net benefits (Calzadilla et al , 2014; Nakajima et al , 2020; Schenker and Stephan, 2014). Some studies point out that the examined adaptation measures may not be sufficient to solve the problem although helpful (Akune et al , 2015; Arndt et al , 2015; Boyd and Ibarrarán, 2009; Elshennawy et al , 2016; Ouraich et al , 2019; Zidouemba, 2017).…”
Section: Review Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The examined investments and funding for adaptation include agricultural sector investments (Arndt et al, 2015(Arndt et al, , 2011Bosello et al, 2018;Calzadilla et al, 2013Calzadilla et al, , 2014Elshennawy et al, 2016;Robinson et al, 2012;Zidouemba, 2017), funding of adaptation in developing regions (Ouraich and Tyner, 2018;Schenker and Stephan, 2014), coastal protection investments (Elshennawy et al, 2016;Parrado et al, 2020;Withey et al, 2016), decrease in investments in risky areas (Husby et al, 2016), utilization of insurance and catastrophic bonds (Thirawat et al, 2017), public investments in adaptation (Bachner et al, 2019;Hirte et al, 2018;Hoffmann, 2019;Hoffmann and Stephan, 2018) and adaptation measure of an artificial beach enhancement (Nakajima et al, 2020).…”
Section: How Adaptation Is Addressed In the Computable General Equili...mentioning
confidence: 99%