2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-benefit analysis of shale development in India: A best-worst method based MCDM approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is seen that the best-worst method is used in many different areas apart from determining the bank performance. For example, Ghaffar et al (2021) Luo et al (2020) used ANP and TOPSIS methods in their study on the selection of a waste-toenergy plant and determined the criteria weights by the best-worst method. Liu et al (2021) determined the criteria weights according to the best-worst method in their study where they conducted environmental performance evaluation using the AHP method.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is seen that the best-worst method is used in many different areas apart from determining the bank performance. For example, Ghaffar et al (2021) Luo et al (2020) used ANP and TOPSIS methods in their study on the selection of a waste-toenergy plant and determined the criteria weights by the best-worst method. Liu et al (2021) determined the criteria weights according to the best-worst method in their study where they conducted environmental performance evaluation using the AHP method.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many applications can be found in the literature. Recently, Naeem et al [5] prioritized strategies for handling the COVID-19 outbreak, Ahmad and Hasan [20] reported the applicability of BWM in the study of wireless networks, Ghaffar et al [21] performed an Identification and analysis of shale development in India, Singh et al [22] evalulated and ranked of Six Sigma enablers, and Xu et al [23] applied BWM in water rights allocation. Sen et al [24] developed a framework for a housing infrastructure system considering flood resilience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the selection of primary sectors involves complex decision-making processes that consider various economic, social, environmental, and political factors. By employing an IVF-MCDM approach, this research aims to provide a structured framework for analyzing and prioritizing primary sectors effectively [11]. Therefore, the motivation behind this research is to provide actionable insights and decision support tools that can inform strategic interventions aimed at strengthening Romania's primary sector activities, driving economic growth, and promoting sustainable development.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many primary sector industries in Romania lag behind in terms of technology adoption and innovation [10,11]. Outdated equipment, inadequate infrastructure, and limited investment in research and development (R&D) hamper productivity and competitiveness, making it challenging to compete in global markets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation