Cost–benefit analysis of tomato in soilless culture systems with saline water under greenhouse conditions

Abstract

BACKGROUND The current need to produce food for a growing population, from diminishing natural resources, such as water and energy, and with minimum environmental degradation, demands the optimization of production. We compare the economic feasibility of tomato production in an open system with a perlite substrate, a closed system with the nutrient film technique (NFT), and a hydroponic crop (deep flow technique, DFT) using three levels of salinity that are found within the normal range for irrigation water quality in southeastern Spain. RESULTS Production with DFT resulted in an increase in the cost of phytosanitary treatments and the cost of maintenance. Production with perlite resulted in an increase in the cost of irrigation water and fertilization, and the use of NFT resulted in an increase in energy costs. The point of price equilibrium was exceeded in the three soilless systems when using low salinity water, and in perlite, with intermediate salinity water. CONCLUSION Profitability was reduced in the following order: perlite > NFT > DFT. There were positive results when using irrigation water with low salinity, and in the case of perlite, with intermediate salinity. In every case, salinity reduced the profitability of the operation, and this was greater when NFT was employed. The analysis of these soilless systems should be continued to determine the possibility of reducing cultivation costs. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry

Magnesium Limitation Leads to Transcriptional Down-Tuning of Auxin Synthesis, Transport, and Signaling in the Tomato Root

“…At the four fully unfolded compound leaf stage (∼23-days after sowing), consistent and uniformly sized seedlings were transferred into continuously aerated 10-L (in 28 × 25 × 17 cm pots) nutrient solution. Nutrient solution composition was slightly modified from a published protocol for tomato culture ( Cámara-Zapata et al, 2019 ). The final nutrient solution contained macro- and micronutrients as follows: 4 mM Ca (NO 3 ) 2 .4H 2 O, 0.6 mM KNO 3 , 1 mM KH 2 PO 4 , 1 mM MgSO 4 .7H 2 O, 90 μM Na 2 Fe-EDTA, 25 μM H 3 BO 3 , 2 μM MnSO 4 .H 2 O, 2 μM ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O, 0.5 μM CuSO 4 .5H 2 O, and 0.5 μM (NH 4 ) 6 Mo 7 O 24 .4H 2 O.…”

The Cost-Benefits and Risks of Using Raffia Made of Biodegradable Polymers: The Case of Pepper and Tomato Production in Greenhouses

“…The harvesting cost considered was EUR 0.029 kg −1 for tomatoes and EUR 0.056 kg −1 for peppers. In other studies, the break-even point of other elements, such as water, was also obtained [50]. However, given the large amount used, its break-even point was much closer to the market price than in the case of raffia.…”

Evaluating the Single-Shot MultiBox Detector and YOLO Deep Learning Models for the Detection of Tomatoes in a Greenhouse

“…While the value of greenhouse tomatoes is high on a per-unit basis, the costs are also high, mainly due to the labour costs. Greenhouse's manual operations account for up to 50% of the total greenhouse production costs, a large part of these costs being absorbed by the manual tomato harvesting, which requires 700 h yr −1 ha −1 to 1400 h yr −1 ha −1 according to the cropping system [2,3]. Hence, manual harvesting of tomatoes is, actually, a challenge due to the global labour shortage and precarious working conditions [2,4,5].…”

“…Greenhouse's manual operations account for up to 50% of the total greenhouse production costs, a large part of these costs being absorbed by the manual tomato harvesting, which requires 700 h yr −1 ha −1 to 1400 h yr −1 ha −1 according to the cropping system [2,3]. Hence, manual harvesting of tomatoes is, actually, a challenge due to the global labour shortage and precarious working conditions [2,4,5]. Moreover, farmers need to secure additional workers during harvest seasons because the manpower requirements are higher than usual during this time [5].…”