2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00296-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of bypass surgery versus stenting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
27
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are different to some previously published works, but agree with the study of Yock et al [21].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are different to some previously published works, but agree with the study of Yock et al [21].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…But, independently of the use of balloons, CIS and, over the last years, DCIS, the number of re-interventions has been the greatest obstacle of the PTA procedure [15][16][17]. Another point considered has been the cost of these procedures [18], which has been unfavorable in respect to the CABG over the first years [19], with the exception of some groups [17,20,21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Markov model the HRQoL values for the chronic conditions were drawn from Danish and American community based preference weights [19,20]. Temporary HRQoL decrements for repeat revascularization were drawn from a previous cost-effectiveness comparing CABG and stenting [21]. In the Markov model the HRQoL for health states other than "Asymptomatic" were estimated using the decrements shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Qalysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is estimated that nearly 95% of all angioplasties (with or without stenting) performed in the United States annually have initially successful outcomes, where success is defined as prevention of death or the need for an emergency CABG [65]. Stenting, which involves the deployment of a tubular mesh structure in an occluded vessel, has improved this success rate by reducing the need for emergency CABG from ~6% to less than 1% [87]. The FDA originally approved coronary stents for use when the results of angioplasty were suboptimal [87].…”
Section: Cad Treatment Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stenting, which involves the deployment of a tubular mesh structure in an occluded vessel, has improved this success rate by reducing the need for emergency CABG from ~6% to less than 1% [87]. The FDA originally approved coronary stents for use when the results of angioplasty were suboptimal [87]. Their use has since increased with approximately 91%…”
Section: Cad Treatment Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%