2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of childhood rotavirus vaccination in Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated as incremental costs divided by incremental quality-adjusted lift year (QALY) gained, in order to determine the priority to purchasing the interventions at different budget levels. The health utility of different disease status were derived from previous literature [30]. A willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds of three times Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita was applied to examine the cost-effectiveness of the vaccination options, as WHO defined interventions with ICER less than three times of GDP per capita as cost-effective and that less than GDP per capita as very cost-effective [31].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated as incremental costs divided by incremental quality-adjusted lift year (QALY) gained, in order to determine the priority to purchasing the interventions at different budget levels. The health utility of different disease status were derived from previous literature [30]. A willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds of three times Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita was applied to examine the cost-effectiveness of the vaccination options, as WHO defined interventions with ICER less than three times of GDP per capita as cost-effective and that less than GDP per capita as very cost-effective [31].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2013 36 CEA (1) Immunisation(2) No immunisation DE SHI Birth cohort 100% 5 y Cases averted and savings Direct and indirect (2011, €) One-way & PSAModel sensitive to the frequency of seeking medical advice, RV disease and hospital visits Net saving: >£9 million RV Imaz et al. 2013 37 CUA (1) Immunisation(2) No immunisation ES Societal Healthcare Birth cohort 100% 5 y QALY Direct and indirect (2011, €) One-wayModel sensitive to the vaccine price, vaccine efficacy and utility values Cost/QALY:£244, 077 (healthcare)£182,982 (societal) RV Aidelsburger et al. 2014 38 CEA (1) Immunisation(s) (2) No immunisation DE SHI < 5 y 80% 5 y QALY Direct and indirect costs (2010, £) One- and 2-wayModel sensitive to herd immunity, utility values, the vaccine price and administration costs Cost/QALY: £118,187–144,208 MD Trotter et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last few years, several studies evaluated the cost-effectiveness of routine infant rotavirus vaccination around the world and reported varying results even studies from the same country; 20,21,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] among them, 2 are from Japan. 20,21 The significant difference between our model and those of the previous studies is the incorporation of rotavirus-related encephalitis/encephalopathy, and sequelae in the model, which were not present in the previous ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%