2022
DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2022.54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of psychological intervention within services for depression delivered by primary care workers in Nepal: economic evaluation of a randomized control trial

Abstract: Background Integrating services for depression into primary care is key to reducing the treatment gap in low- and middle-income countries. We examined the value of providing the Healthy Activity Programme (HAP), a behavioral activation psychological intervention, within services for depression delivered by primary care workers in Chitwan, Nepal using data from the Programme for Improving Mental Health Care. Methods People diagnosed with depression were randomized to receive either standa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of treatment status, it cost between $6.80 and $20.81 to deliver Shamiri to each student. This is similar to the $22.40 (2020 USD) cost per participant to provide usual care plus adjunctive depression services (psychoeducation, antidepressant pharmacotherapy, and home-based follow-up) in a primary care center in Nepal [ 51 ], which has a similar purchasing power (34.3) to Kenya (43.8) [ 45 ]. Of note, in the context of different cost methodologies and outcome metrics across studies, direct comparisons of cost-effectiveness are difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Regardless of treatment status, it cost between $6.80 and $20.81 to deliver Shamiri to each student. This is similar to the $22.40 (2020 USD) cost per participant to provide usual care plus adjunctive depression services (psychoeducation, antidepressant pharmacotherapy, and home-based follow-up) in a primary care center in Nepal [ 51 ], which has a similar purchasing power (34.3) to Kenya (43.8) [ 45 ]. Of note, in the context of different cost methodologies and outcome metrics across studies, direct comparisons of cost-effectiveness are difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%