2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.05.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of vaccination against cervical cancer: A multi-regional analysis assessing the impact of vaccine characteristics and alternative vaccination scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A previously developed lifetime Markov cohort model with a 1-year cycle simulating the natural history of oncogenic HPV in cervical cancer (normal, HPV infection, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN], cervical cancer, cervical cancer deaths, other deaths) and the effect of screening and vaccination was adapted to reflect the Taiwanese settings [20,23,24]. An additional component to the initial model was appended by Demarteau and Standaert [25] to account for the low-risk HPV infections (including HPV types 6 and 11) that may result in CIN1 and/or GW.…”
Section: Model Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A previously developed lifetime Markov cohort model with a 1-year cycle simulating the natural history of oncogenic HPV in cervical cancer (normal, HPV infection, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN], cervical cancer, cervical cancer deaths, other deaths) and the effect of screening and vaccination was adapted to reflect the Taiwanese settings [20,23,24]. An additional component to the initial model was appended by Demarteau and Standaert [25] to account for the low-risk HPV infections (including HPV types 6 and 11) that may result in CIN1 and/or GW.…”
Section: Model Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Suárez et al [20], the cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination versus screening alone was evaluated for five countries or regions, including Taiwan. Suarez et al estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination, with a bivalent vaccine, versus no vaccination at new Taiwan dollars (NT $) 278,665 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained (ϭUS $8,700) for Taiwan at a vaccine price of NT $4,000 per dose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the phenomenon of waning is uncertain, (29) it is included in many modelling studies in which the estimated benefit of vaccination is reduced as a result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Recent studies have suggested that AS04-HPV-16/18v also provides moderate cross-protection against persistent infection by HPV-6 and HPV-11. (21)(22)(23)(24) The cost-effectiveness of both AS04-HPV-16/18v and 4vHPV has been evaluated in a number of countries in order to establish the value of introducing nationwide immunisation programmes, (25)(26)(27)(28)(29) in accordance with the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommendation to first establish the cost-effectiveness of a new vaccine in the country before introduction. (30) While the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the three-dose vaccine regimens have been evaluated for Singapore, (31,32) there are no such cost-effectiveness studies on the two-dose vaccine regimens to our knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 Vaccine uptake is crucial to the success of a publicly funded HPV vaccination program. Several factors can affect the rate of public acceptance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%