2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost, energy, global warming, eutrophication and local human health impacts of community water and sanitation service options

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sustainability of the OSS was assessed by defining a set of sustainability criteria and related indicators. The criteria were selected based on available scientific literature assessing wastewater systems 4,8,10,15,18 and were organized into five main categories: Environmental, Economic, Socio-cultural, Technical and Health-related. A number of assessable indicators were defined for each criterion, which were accounted for either qualitatively or quantitatively ( Table 1).…”
Section: Sustainability Criteria and Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sustainability of the OSS was assessed by defining a set of sustainability criteria and related indicators. The criteria were selected based on available scientific literature assessing wastewater systems 4,8,10,15,18 and were organized into five main categories: Environmental, Economic, Socio-cultural, Technical and Health-related. A number of assessable indicators were defined for each criterion, which were accounted for either qualitatively or quantitatively ( Table 1).…”
Section: Sustainability Criteria and Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have discussed and proposed indicators based on sustainability principles to evaluate wastewater treatment systems based on literature data. 4,10,11 Furthermore, life cycle approaches, [12][13][14][15] environmental systems analyses 16,17 and sustainability assessments 18,19 have been applied. Due to the large number of small-scale and on-site sanitation technologies that currently exist, 20 and despite the criteria and indicators already suggested in the scientific literature, 8,10,11 there is a lack of application of such information in a knowledge-based decision support context for OSSs that also incorporate the stakeholders' views to handle the trade-offs between indicators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering various water supply alternatives, the evaluation and optimization of life cycle cost can be invaluable to the decision‐making process (Bradshaw, Ashoori, Osorio, & Luthy, ). A more comprehensive triple bottom line analysis might even be warranted because of its ability to simultaneously consider the social, environmental, and economic implications of an engineering design (Haak, Sundaram, & Pagilla, ; Schimmoller, Kealy, & Foster, ; Schoen et al, ). With respect to social considerations, the recent literature demonstrates that, when designed and operated properly, potable reuse systems provide adequate protection of public health (Amoueyan, Ahmad, Eisenberg, & Gerrity, ; Amoueyan, Ahmad, Eisenberg, Pecson, & Gerrity, ; Chaudhry, Hamilton, Haas, & Nelson, ; Pecson et al, ; Pecson, Trussell, Pisarenko, & Trussell, ; Soller, Eftim, Warren, & Nappier, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deteriorating quality of surface water and groundwater is a global issue, and any measures aimed at improving it must be taken at the stage of local environmental management. Each aquatic ecosystem has a defined tolerance range to progressive human threats and climate change [2]. The latter lead to the depletion of water resources [3] and a deterioration of their quality [4], which intensified the eutrophication process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%