2020
DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1835306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost savings with hemin versus givosiran for the treatment of patients with acute intermittent porphyria (AIP)

Abstract: Objective: Since 1983, hemin has been FDA-approved for acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) attacks. In 2019, FDA approved givosiran for the treatment of adults with acute hepatic porphyria. The objective of this research was to estimate and compare the total cost of AIP-related healthcare for patients treated with hemin or givosiran. Methods: A microsimulation cost model was developed to estimate the annual economic impact of hemin versus givosiran treatment for patients with AIP from the U.S. healthcare payer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The financial burden of treatment for patients with AIP has been the focus of several recent studies (Gouya et al, 2018;Blaylock et al, 2020;Massachi et al, 2020). While FDAapproved givosiran has been shown to reduce the severity and frequency of porphyric attacks in acute hepatic porphyria (Balwani et al, 2020), hemin was found to be the less costly option compared to givosiran for AIP patients due accessibility and current cost for use (Massachi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The financial burden of treatment for patients with AIP has been the focus of several recent studies (Gouya et al, 2018;Blaylock et al, 2020;Massachi et al, 2020). While FDAapproved givosiran has been shown to reduce the severity and frequency of porphyric attacks in acute hepatic porphyria (Balwani et al, 2020), hemin was found to be the less costly option compared to givosiran for AIP patients due accessibility and current cost for use (Massachi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The financial burden of treatment for patients with AIP has been the focus of several recent studies (Gouya et al, 2018;Blaylock et al, 2020;Massachi et al, 2020). While FDAapproved givosiran has been shown to reduce the severity and frequency of porphyric attacks in acute hepatic porphyria (Balwani et al, 2020), hemin was found to be the less costly option compared to givosiran for AIP patients due accessibility and current cost for use (Massachi et al, 2020). Based on the published study by Massachi et al, 2020, the total cost of care with hemin for patients with single/multiple attacks per year, and hemin prophylaxis was between 46 and 92% lower compared to givosiran treatment in (Massachi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent analysis of total costs for givosiran vs IV heme, either for treatment of acute attacks or for prophylaxis, assuming once weekly IV heme vs once monthly givosiran, showed that IV heme is much less expensive. 88 Specifically, for all patients with AIP, the average annual total cost of care for IV heme therapy was $482,113 [78%] lower than for givosiran.…”
Section: Management Of Ahpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Massachi et al [ 117 ] compared the costs for givosiran with those for hemin in the US and arrived at the conclusion of lower annual total costs of care with hemin treatment. The novel individualized dosing approach (see above) had, however, not been available at the time of this analysis.…”
Section: Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%