2018
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost–utility analysis of bariatric surgery

Abstract: Currently used surgical methods were found to be cost saving over the lifetime of individuals treated in England.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obesity is a common metabolic disease that is increasing worldwide 1 . Bariatric surgery treats obesity and related metabolic syndromes, including obstructive sleep apnoea, diabetes, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and orthopaedic physical dysfunction 2,3 , and has been found to be associated with reduced mean costs to the health service 4 . Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and vertical sleeve gastrectomy are the two most commonly used procedures 5,6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obesity is a common metabolic disease that is increasing worldwide 1 . Bariatric surgery treats obesity and related metabolic syndromes, including obstructive sleep apnoea, diabetes, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and orthopaedic physical dysfunction 2,3 , and has been found to be associated with reduced mean costs to the health service 4 . Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and vertical sleeve gastrectomy are the two most commonly used procedures 5,6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obesity is increasing worldwide, including patients suffering from psychiatric disorders. The most effective treatment for obesity is bariatric surgery, which has been proven to be safe [1] and cost-effective [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After removing duplicate papers 1096 studies remained for title and abstract screening, with 63 studies included for full‐text review. Of these, 24 partial and full health economic evaluation studies were included in the updated systematic review . These studies were also assessed against the eligibility criteria for quantitative meta‐analyses together with the n = 77 eligible health economic evaluations from our previous systematic review (low part of Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, when costs were qualitatively synthesised, the review found heterogeneous results. For instance, across the depth and breadth of the comprehensive review's 77 included studies, some of the studies showed that the average total costs were higher in the bariatric group, whilst others revealed that the control group had higher costs . A narrative synthesis of the before and after bariatric surgery studies showed that total costs were higher after surgery in the shorter term …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%