1986
DOI: 10.1139/z86-348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Costs and benefits to Red-breasted Mergansers nesting in tern and gull colonies

Abstract: The costs and benefits to Red-breasted Mergansers (Mergus serrator) nesting in a Common Tern (Sterna hirundo) colony and a Herring Gull (Larus argentatus) and Great Black-backed Gull (L. marinus) colony were studied from 5 June to 17 August 1984 on islands off the east coast of New Brunswick. Merganser nests outside larid colonies were preyed upon significantly more than nests in the tern colony while no difference was found with nests in the gull colony. Nests in the tern colony were more densely concentrated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It appears that king eiders nesting on islands with nesting arctic terns have greater nesting success than those nesting on islands without terns. This phenomenon has been reported for other waterfowl species as well (Evans, 1970;Young and Titman, 1986).…”
Section: Nesting Associationssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It appears that king eiders nesting on islands with nesting arctic terns have greater nesting success than those nesting on islands without terns. This phenomenon has been reported for other waterfowl species as well (Evans, 1970;Young and Titman, 1986).…”
Section: Nesting Associationssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Scaup were frequently found nesting in larid colonies. Ducks and other aquatic birds (e.g., grebes) apparently benefit from such associations because larids are effective at defending the nesting area against some types of predators (Koskimies, 1957;Hilden, 1964;Kistchinski and Flint, 1974;Newton and Campbell, 1975;Nuechterlein, 1981;Burger, 1984;Young and Titman, 1986;Burger and Gochfeld, 1995). However, such advantages might be offset by high duckling mortality when ducks nest among highly predatory larids, such as California gulls (Larus californicus) and herring gulls (Larus argentatus) (Vermeer, 1968;Dwernychuk and Boag, 1972).…”
Section: Habitat Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher duck nest densities are generally observed close to gull colonies (Koskimies 1957;Hilden 1965;Dwernychug and Boag 1972) where nest predation may be lower (Bengtson 1972;Newton and Campbell 1975;Young and (Sullivan and Dinsmore 1990;Albrecht et al 2006). This result is in accordance with the specific habitat use of Pochard in fishpond regions (Havlin 1966).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the distribution of breeding ducks versus three other bird species used as habitat quality indicators (Mute Swan Cygnus olor, Black-headed Gull Larus ridibundus and Purple Heron Ardea purpurea) among fishponds. Paired Mute Swans are suspected to negatively influence duck pair distribution by their aggressive territorial behaviour (Willey 1968;Reese 1975;Ciaranca 1990;Conover and Kania 1994), while anti-predator strategy of Black-headed Gull colonies could benefit to breeding waterfowl (Bengtson 1972;Newton and Campbell 1975;Young and Titman 1986;Väänänen 2000). Purple Heron is an indicator species of reedbeds that are flooded during the waterfowl breeding period, without sudden water level variations (Moser 1984;Broyer et al 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%