2015
DOI: 10.1126/science.aad0344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cotranslational protein folding on the ribosome monitored in real time

Abstract: The gene coding for the protein methyl transferase HemK (ECBD_2409, 834 bp, 277 aa) was amplified from the genomic DNA of E. coli BL21 DE3 by colony PCR using the primers 5'-GTCCGAGCAGGACATATGGAATATCAA-3' and 5'-GCAGTGTAG AAAAACCTCGAGTTGATAAT-3', digested with NdeI and XhoI (New England Biolabs) and ligated into a pET-24a Vector (Novagen). The gene sequence encoding for the N-terminal domain of E. coli HemK (residues 1-73, HemK NTD hereafter) was amplified by PCR from a vector encoding full-length HemK (res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
259
3
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(282 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
17
259
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As explained above, the circumstances under which proteins are introduced in in vivo or in vitro experiments (i.e., full-length sequence versus growing polypeptide) differ considerably. Though in some cases chemically or sequentially truncated versions of proteins have been studied for their folding behaviour (21)(22)(23)(24), these experiments do not take into account the other major differences between in vivo and in vitro circumstances. As the lifetimes of proteins in cells can range from minutes to years (25) there is ample time for multiple folding rounds for fully synthesized protein.…”
Section: Differences Between Folding In Vivo and In Vitromentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As explained above, the circumstances under which proteins are introduced in in vivo or in vitro experiments (i.e., full-length sequence versus growing polypeptide) differ considerably. Though in some cases chemically or sequentially truncated versions of proteins have been studied for their folding behaviour (21)(22)(23)(24), these experiments do not take into account the other major differences between in vivo and in vitro circumstances. As the lifetimes of proteins in cells can range from minutes to years (25) there is ample time for multiple folding rounds for fully synthesized protein.…”
Section: Differences Between Folding In Vivo and In Vitromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construct used for RNC production consists of several components ( Fig. 5) (38,57): a triple Strep-tag for purification purpose; a Smt3-domain with a C-terminal Ulp1-protease cleavage site to produce authentic N-termini for RNCs; the flavodoxin sequence; a TEV-protease site located C-terminally of the flavodoxin sequence to enable release of the nascent chain from the ribosome; a linker that spans the ribosomal exit tunnel; and the SecM sequence, which stalls the nascent chain to the ribosome.…”
Section: Elucidating Cotranslational Folding Of Flavodoxinmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations