2012
DOI: 10.1644/11-mamm-s-172.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Could you please phrase “home range” as a question?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
162
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
3
162
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas an animal's home range is often defined as the area used by an animal during normal activities such as food gathering, mating and caring for its young (Burt 1943;Fieberg and Börger 2012), the last two components were not included here, and we only considered relocations in a predefined area.…”
Section: Activity-range Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas an animal's home range is often defined as the area used by an animal during normal activities such as food gathering, mating and caring for its young (Burt 1943;Fieberg and Börger 2012), the last two components were not included here, and we only considered relocations in a predefined area.…”
Section: Activity-range Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…range) from biologger-derived location data (Fieberg and Börger, 2012). Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) remains one of the most common tools for visualizing and quantifying animal ranges and distributions since its inception in ecological studies (Worton, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When applied to tracking data, the result of a KDE analysis is the creation of contours representing densities or intensities of space use, often called a Kernel Density Estimate (herein we use "KDE" interchangeably to refer to both the analytical approach and output of the analysis). There has been much discussion over best practices in implementing and reporting for KDE and other similar approaches, and these have been thoroughly reviewed elsewhere (e.g., Laver and Kelly, 2008;Kie et al, 2010;Fieberg and Börger, 2012;Fleming et al, 2015;Signer et al, 2015). Despite shifting baselines in execution, KDE continues to endure among ecologists as a relatively simple and accessible tool for describing space use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the MCP method is in general not the most accurate for finding home range sizes (Fieberg and Börger 2012), we use it only to find a starting point for running the Nelder-Mead algorithm. Though a more accurate method, for example, kernel density estimation (KDE; Laver and Kelly 2008), may cause the algorithm to converge slightly more quickly, the estimation method we use to obtain the algorithm's initial condition makes no difference to the outcome of the algorithm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%