2004
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2003.823045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Count-Rate Dependent Event Mispositioning and NEC in PET

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the NECR does not account for possible count rate bias such as the systematic mispositioning of data because of spatial pile-up effects. 28 The aim of this study is to evaluate using phantoms the relationship between the NECR and the SNR in PET imaging when a fully 3D OSEM reconstruction algorithm is applied. To our knowledge, this relationship has not been previously studied for a fully 3D OSEM reconstruction model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the NECR does not account for possible count rate bias such as the systematic mispositioning of data because of spatial pile-up effects. 28 The aim of this study is to evaluate using phantoms the relationship between the NECR and the SNR in PET imaging when a fully 3D OSEM reconstruction algorithm is applied. To our knowledge, this relationship has not been previously studied for a fully 3D OSEM reconstruction model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the starting activity of 20 MBq of these measurements, the singles data loss of the 1st prototype was 10% as shown in figure 11(b). At this activity, multi-event pileups degraded imaging performance by mispositioning on the Anger calculation (Badawi et al 2004). This was because our four layered DOI detector had a burden in separating 1024 GSOZ crystal responses on a flood histogram (Yoshida et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike that reported by Chang et al (2012), we did not reach the peak NECR. Additional experiments at higher count rates for the Biograph mCT must be conducted to assess the possible dependence of count-rate on event mispositioning (Badawi et al 2004), and make possible a comparison with existing published data. Additionally, the quadratic relationship between SNR 2 and NEC found with the phantom data did not hold true when considering patient data, unlike the relationship between SNR 2 and the number of true events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%