2001
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.7.1100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counteracting tobacco motor sports sponsorship as a promotional tool: is the tobacco settlement enough?

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: This study sought to quantify television advertising exposure achieved by tobacco companies through sponsorship of motor sports events and to evaluate the likely effect of the Master Settlement Agreement on this advertising. METHODS: Data from Sponsors Report, which quantifies the exposure that sponsors of selected televised sporting events receive during broadcasts of those events, were compiled for all motor sports events covered by the service for the period 1997 through 1999. RESULTS: From 1997… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If at the time of the study such ads were more likely to appear in media channels assessed by our measures (e.g., magazines), this could have affected our results. Similarly, if advertising through channels not captured by our measure differentially affect males, such as point-of-sale promotions or event sponsorships (e.g., music, sports), this could have influenced our findings as well (Hafez & Ling, 2006;Henriksen, Feighery, Wang & Fortmann, 2004;Siegel, 2001). Continued investigation into gender differences in adolescent exposure to tobacco advertising, particularly as tobacco companies shift the channels through which they promote their products in light of increasingly stronger advertising restrictions (e.g., Freeman & Chapman, 2010), is an important avenue for future research to clarify these results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If at the time of the study such ads were more likely to appear in media channels assessed by our measures (e.g., magazines), this could have affected our results. Similarly, if advertising through channels not captured by our measure differentially affect males, such as point-of-sale promotions or event sponsorships (e.g., music, sports), this could have influenced our findings as well (Hafez & Ling, 2006;Henriksen, Feighery, Wang & Fortmann, 2004;Siegel, 2001). Continued investigation into gender differences in adolescent exposure to tobacco advertising, particularly as tobacco companies shift the channels through which they promote their products in light of increasingly stronger advertising restrictions (e.g., Freeman & Chapman, 2010), is an important avenue for future research to clarify these results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, Philip Morris International used the women’s tennis tour to promote their Virginia Slims brand throughout the 1970s and 1980s 19 . Motor sports were strongly associated with tobacco sponsorship from 1968 20 18 .…”
Section: Sport and Tobaccomentioning
confidence: 99%