2008
DOI: 10.37236/816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counting Defective Parking Functions

Abstract: Suppose that m drivers each choose a preferred parking space in a linear car park with n spaces. Each driver goes to the chosen space and parks there if it is free, and otherwise takes the first available space with a larger number (if any). If all drivers park successfully, the sequence of choices is called a parking function. In general, if k drivers fail to park, we have a defective parking function of defect k. Let cp(n, m, k) be the number of such functions.In this paper, we establish a recurrence relatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another promising direction is to study defective tree parking functions, i.e., to study the "overflow" of the number of drivers, which could not park successfully (see [3] for a respective treatment on ordinary parking functions). With the methods proposed it seems that the results presented could be extended to this problem and the author plans to comment on that in a future work.…”
Section: Outlook and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another promising direction is to study defective tree parking functions, i.e., to study the "overflow" of the number of drivers, which could not park successfully (see [3] for a respective treatment on ordinary parking functions). With the methods proposed it seems that the results presented could be extended to this problem and the author plans to comment on that in a future work.…”
Section: Outlook and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…w) • e nh(w) dw, withg(w) = (1 − 3w)( n−m 2n−1 + w) w(1 − w)(1 + w)3 , h(w) choose as contour in the contour integral representation a suitable simple positively oriented closed curve around the origin. To locate the saddle points in the relevant part e nh(w) of the integrand, we have to solve the equationh (w) = (3w − 1)(m − nw) nw(1 − w)(1 + w) = 0,yielding the solutions w 1 = m n and w 2 = 1 3…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Konheim and Weiss [7] introduced the concept of parking functions that can be thus described. Suppose that n drivers want to park in a one-way street with exactly n places and that a ∈ [n] n is the record of the preferred parking slots, that is, a i is the preferred (3) With this definition, 1 := (1, . .…”
Section: Graphical Parking Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The restriction to [k, n] of a function a that parks all the n + 1 − k elements of [k, n] is a particular case of a defective parking function introduced by Cameron, Johannsen, Prellberg and Schweitzer [3]. Hence, the number T k of all functions that park every element of [k, n] is n k−1 c(n, n + 1 − k, 0), where c(n, m, k) is the number of (n, m, k)-defective parking functions [3, pp.3], that is T k = k n k−1 (n + 1) n−k .…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known that there are (n+1) n−1 parking functions of length n, while there are (n−m+1)(n+1) m−1 classical (n, m)-parking functions [3]. Classical parking functions have appeared throughout combinatorics as chains in the noncrossing lattice, in enumeration of hyperplane arrangements, in noncrossing partitions, and in tree enumeration (see [5,12,14] as well as references herein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%