2011
DOI: 10.2140/gt.2011.15.2321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counting lattice points in compactified moduli spaces of curves

Abstract: We define and count lattice points in the moduli space S M g;n of stable genus g curves with n labeled points. This extends a construction of the second author for the uncompactified moduli space M g;n . The enumeration produces polynomials whose top degree coefficients are tautological intersection numbers on S M g;n and whose constant term is the orbifold Euler characteristic of S M g;n . We prove a recursive formula which can be used to effectively calculate these polynomials. One consequence of these resul… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
40
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…His proof is similar in that it involved an edge removal operation, but the main formula and its proof therein contained are incorrectly recorded -the terms involving products of functions N g,n were double counted and need a compensating factor of 1 2 . A corrected version appears in [10,41]. Our proof presented here is new, and is based on a different idea using ciliation.…”
Section: Definition 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His proof is similar in that it involved an edge removal operation, but the main formula and its proof therein contained are incorrectly recorded -the terms involving products of functions N g,n were double counted and need a compensating factor of 1 2 . A corrected version appears in [10,41]. Our proof presented here is new, and is based on a different idea using ciliation.…”
Section: Definition 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they are not sufficient. For instance, N 7 3,2 (2n + 1, 1) = N 3,2,n+2 (2n + 1, 1) = 0, but max(0, 6 − n) = max(k, 2g + n − 1 − 1 2 b i ) ≤ 7 = t ≤ min(3g − 3 + n, 2g + n − 1) = min (8,7). To see why, suppose there were such an arc diagram; then there must be a (necessarily non-separating) arc connecting the two boundary components.…”
Section: Inequalities On Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the spectral curve x(z) = z + 1 z and y(z) = z, the dilaton equation was used to define the enumeration of ribbon graphs where some of the b i are equal to zero [26]. This was a crucial ingredient in the enumeration of lattice points in the Deligne-Mumford compactification of moduli spaces of curves [9].…”
Section: Bmmentioning
confidence: 99%