2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2005.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled dynamic analysis of a mini TLP: Comparison with measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters of the model are same with those in introduce pronounced influence on the submarine structure [11][12][13] . For example, the vertical motion (heave) of the platform may make the riser tension change remarkably, or even, in extreme case, into negative value at certain positions.…”
Section: Viv Of Riser With Varying Structural Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters of the model are same with those in introduce pronounced influence on the submarine structure [11][12][13] . For example, the vertical motion (heave) of the platform may make the riser tension change remarkably, or even, in extreme case, into negative value at certain positions.…”
Section: Viv Of Riser With Varying Structural Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore some complicated phenomena, e.g. multi-mode vibration and wider-band random vibration, of the vortex-induced vibration of long flexible risers are frequently observed (Chen et al, 2006;Gu et al, 2012;Heurtier et al, 2001;Lou et al, 2010;Stansberg et al, 2002;Tahara and Kim, 2003). On the other hand, compared to fixed platform in shallow water, floating platform in deep water has more significant motion amplitude, and the coupling between top-end vessel and submarine riser appears to be more remarkable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the analysis methods concerning interactions of top-end vessel and marine structures can be classified into two kinds: the quasi-static method (Ormberg et al, 1997;Kim et al, 2001;Spanos et al, 2005;Wichers et al, 2001;Xu et al, 2009) and the coupled method (Bosman and Hooker, 1999;Chen et al, 2006;Gu et al, 2012;Li et al, 2010;Tahara and Kim, 2003). In the quasi-static method, riser is simplified as a spring with lumped mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the methods of those researches can be classified into two kinds: quasi-static method [8][9][10][11] and coupled method [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] . In quasi-static method, riser is modeled by a spring with lumped mass, and only hydrostatic restoring force of riser is considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%