2014
DOI: 10.1680/geolett.13.00068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled hydromechanical analysis of an underground compressed air energy storage facility in sandstone

Abstract: The underground storage of compressed air is a favourable and low-cost option for balancing offpeak electricity demands. Large volumes of air can be compressed and stored in the ground during low-demand electricity periods, and this pressurised air can then be released to generate electricity during high-demand times. Excavated caverns (generally in salt rock), depleted gas fields and abandoned/excavated mines are the main options typically considered in the design of a compressed air energy storage (CAES) fac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compressed air energy storage in aquifers (CAESA), which costs less and has a wider availability, is becoming more attractive compared with CAESC [2,14]. The feasibility of CAESA was investigated by Oldenburg and Pan using numerical modelling, which showed its energy efficiency well using the operation scheme in the Huntorf plant [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compressed air energy storage in aquifers (CAESA), which costs less and has a wider availability, is becoming more attractive compared with CAESC [2,14]. The feasibility of CAESA was investigated by Oldenburg and Pan using numerical modelling, which showed its energy efficiency well using the operation scheme in the Huntorf plant [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geological features made of caprock, aquifer, and bedrock can be used for potential CAES facilities. However, the numerical analysis with field exploration shows that the aquifer site at Iowa in the USA fails to properly make the air bubble due to the unfavorable low permeability within the formation and the heterogeneous permeability of the reservoir exacerbates the situation due to the development of undesirable fingering and air passage [4]. Contrary to two geological formations for CAES design, an excavated cavern in the sedimentary formation provides greater flexibility for site selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), compressed air energy storage (Sánchez et al . ), wastewater injection (Ellsworth ) and geologic carbon storage (Rutqvist ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%