2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.01.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled thermoviscoplasticity of glassy polymers in the logarithmic strain space based on the free volume theory

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThe paper outlines a constitutive model for finite thermo-visco-plastic behavior of amorphous glassy polymers and considers details of its numerical implementation. In contrast to existing kinematical approaches to finite plasticity of glassy polymers, the formulation applies a plastic metric theory based on an additive split of Lagrangian Hencky-type strains into elastic and plastic parts. The analogy between the proposed formulation in the logarithmic strain space and the geometrically linear … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the definition of constitutive relations and a linear evolution equation to determine the internal variables, we work entirely in the logarithmic strain space. This concept was initially developed and applied in the context of plasticity [35, 34, 33, 36, 19] and allows for an additive split in logarithmic elastic and viscous strains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the definition of constitutive relations and a linear evolution equation to determine the internal variables, we work entirely in the logarithmic strain space. This concept was initially developed and applied in the context of plasticity [35, 34, 33, 36, 19] and allows for an additive split in logarithmic elastic and viscous strains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…\scrL 1 and \scrL 2 := \partial 2 \bfitE (0) /\partial\bfitC \otimes \partial\bfitC are needed for the calculation of \bfitS and its corresponding elasticity tensor, which appears in the FE stiffness matrix 7 . There is a high computational cost for the calculation of \scrL 1 and \scrL 2 [56,57,58,2,1] due to double and quadruple contraction with the logarithmic stress \bfitS (0) := \partialW/\partial\bfitE (0) and its tangent \partial\bfitS (0) /\partial\bfitE (0) (see Kumar and Parks [2]). This computational cost can be reduced for isotropic material models [59,60] but this is not possible for anisotropic material models.…”
Section: Finite Element Formulation For Kirchhoff-love Shellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reader is referred to [198] for a finite element approach in thermoviscoplasticity involving operator splitting. Furthermore, in order to derive a rather complete model of a geothermal reservoir, fluid and heat flow models have to be coupled with a stress field model [176,286].…”
Section: Future Research Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%