2013
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0000606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling a Mesoscale Atmospheric Model with a Distributed Hydrological Model Applied to a Watershed in Southeast Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…precipitation, temperature and other meteorological factors) after downscaling drive hydrological models to simulate the hydrological variables such as evapotranspiration and runoff. This one-way coupling method is easy to operate and has been widely used (Wilby and Wigley, 2000;Kruk et al, 2013;Xu et al, 2015). However, one-way coupling does not result in good simulation accuracy for hydrological processes within a certain basin because it lacks the feedback of hydrology with atmosphere.…”
Section: Development Of Atmosphere-hydrology Simulations From One-waymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…precipitation, temperature and other meteorological factors) after downscaling drive hydrological models to simulate the hydrological variables such as evapotranspiration and runoff. This one-way coupling method is easy to operate and has been widely used (Wilby and Wigley, 2000;Kruk et al, 2013;Xu et al, 2015). However, one-way coupling does not result in good simulation accuracy for hydrological processes within a certain basin because it lacks the feedback of hydrology with atmosphere.…”
Section: Development Of Atmosphere-hydrology Simulations From One-waymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies demonstrated that RCMs significantly improve rainfall estimates (ALVES; CAMPOS; SERVAIN, 2012;BLOCK et al, 2009;BRAGA et al, 2013;KRUK;VENDRAME;CHOU, 2013;KWON et al, 2012; OLIVEIRA; PEDROLLO; CASTRO, 2015a, 2015b; PEREIRA; MORAES; UVO, 2014). That's also valid when RCM is coupled inline with a hydrological model (PEREIRA; MORAES; UVO, 2014).…”
Section: Studies Addressing 'Model Evaluation'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When combined with RCM outputs, Braga et al (2013) and Oliveira, Pedrollo and Castro (2015a) demonstrated advantages in applying DCF for monthly scale. On the other hand, when intended for high resolution studies, Kruk, Vendrame and Chou (2013) concluded that the technique is useless. Oliveira, Pedrollo and Castro (2015a) shows no evidence of the superiority of one bias correction technique over the others.…”
Section: Studies Addressing 'Model Evaluation'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BENOIT et al, 2003;LEMOIGNE;NOILHAN, 2004;COLLISCHONN et al, 2005;VERBUNT et al, 2006;KRUK;VENDRAME;CHOU, 2013). This can be explained by the fact that precipitation is one of the most difficult variables to be forecasted, since it is very sensitive to both initial state of the atmosphere and representation of physical processes in numerical weather models (STENSRUD; BAO;WARNER, 2000;GOLDING, 2000;EBERT, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%