2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling of bioaugmentation and biostimulation to improve lindane removal from different soil types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all bioremediation treatments, DHA increased at 90 d. The higher values of DHA activity in soil mycoaugmented with P. sajor-caju LBM 105 compared to controls may be explained by enhanced PCBs removal, contributing in decreasing the prejudicial pollutant effects on soil microbiota, with a consequent improvement in soil biochemical parameters (Ba� cmaga et al, 2017). Also, the addition of sugarcane bagasse could stimulate enzyme secretion by the autochthonous microbiota and/or inoculated strains (Raimondo et al, 2020). Reduced enzyme activity in controls soils compared to treated ones could indicate toxic effects on soil microorganisms or enzyme inhibition exerted by PCBs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In all bioremediation treatments, DHA increased at 90 d. The higher values of DHA activity in soil mycoaugmented with P. sajor-caju LBM 105 compared to controls may be explained by enhanced PCBs removal, contributing in decreasing the prejudicial pollutant effects on soil microbiota, with a consequent improvement in soil biochemical parameters (Ba� cmaga et al, 2017). Also, the addition of sugarcane bagasse could stimulate enzyme secretion by the autochthonous microbiota and/or inoculated strains (Raimondo et al, 2020). Reduced enzyme activity in controls soils compared to treated ones could indicate toxic effects on soil microorganisms or enzyme inhibition exerted by PCBs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In 1991, Madsen [35] first described the mechanism of bioremediation technology in situ for repairing soil organochlorine and insecticide. Raimondo et al [36] showed that the use of biofortification method by biostimulation significantly increased the removal rate of Lindan, up to 86.3%, and it also pointed out that the use of sugarcane bagasse life stimulation combination with biofortification with actinobacteria was a very effective strategic method. However, Castro-Gutiérrez et al [37] studied the effect of biofortification on pesticide degradation and microbial community outcomes under biopurification systems and showed that biofortification did not affect pesticide removal efficiency or the structures of microbial communities (bacteria and fungi).…”
Section: Remediation Methods Of Pesticides In Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to improve the removal of the pollutant, various studies have considered the coupling of bioaugmentation and biostimulation process. For example, Raimondo et al has observed the highest elimination rate of lindane, an organochlorine pesticide, by the coupling of bioaugmentation and biostimulation [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%