2009
DOI: 10.3794/johlste.82.221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Course design in sport management education: Addressing students' perspectives through conjoint methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three dimensions of interest were defined: e-learning technology, teaching method and knowledge assessment. They were chosen by considering previous research (Katz, 2002;Ferguson and DeFelice, 2010;Won and Bravo, 2009) and authors' own experience in teaching in e-learning environments.…”
Section: Research Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three dimensions of interest were defined: e-learning technology, teaching method and knowledge assessment. They were chosen by considering previous research (Katz, 2002;Ferguson and DeFelice, 2010;Won and Bravo, 2009) and authors' own experience in teaching in e-learning environments.…”
Section: Research Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conjoint analysis has been successfully applied in the education industry for many years to reveal students' preferences for different aspects of education (Tashchian and Freiden, 1983;Soutar and Turner, 2002;Sohn and Ju, 2010;Taylor, Humphreys, Singley, and Hunter, 2004;Won and Bravo, 2009;Kuzmanovic, Savic, Popovic and Martic, 2013;Azarcon, Gallardo, Anacin and Velasco, 2014;Zwarts, Vanthournout, Gijbels and Van den Bossche, 2015;Popović, Vagić, Kuzmanović and Anđelković Labrović, 2016;Walsh and Cullinan, 2017;Carey et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Value relative importance stands for relative importance of one attribute to the other ones. Won and Bravo (2009) conducted research in course design for sport management with the objectives to gain insight of students in choosing a course programs and designing a conjoint model that could be applied in decision model in the context of sport management course. They argued in their study that students choose courses that meet their needs the most.…”
Section: Theory On Consumer Preferences and Conjoint Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zampetakis, Manios and Moustakis (2006) propose a four attribute CA in a 4 × 3 × 2 × 2 design reduced to 1/3 using SPSS-CA procedure in order to design courses in environmental entrepreneurship education programs. In Won and Bravo (2009) six course attributes in sport management undergraduate students were evaluated using classical CA and OLS, followed by sensitivity analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%