2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00054.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Courtship and copulation, but not ejaculates, reduce the longevity of female field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus)

Abstract: Females of many taxa incur fitness costs from male sexual coercion and harassment leading to mating. Although male crickets cannot force copulations on females, female Gryllus bimaculatus in this study incurred significant reductions in longevity through being exposed to different levels of male courtship. Virgin females kept in isolation had the longest life spans. Reductions in longevity applied to females in sensory contact with males (without the opportunity to mate), females that courted and mated and fem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the females in our laboratory study were virgins and therefore were likely to be receptive to mating, male harassment is undoubtedly costly to females, as has been demonstrated in other insects [36,37]. Females in the low-mating-opportunity treatment had both greater POA and a stronger encapsulation response, as would be predicted if male harassment in the mating opportunity treatment caused a depressed female immune response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Although the females in our laboratory study were virgins and therefore were likely to be receptive to mating, male harassment is undoubtedly costly to females, as has been demonstrated in other insects [36,37]. Females in the low-mating-opportunity treatment had both greater POA and a stronger encapsulation response, as would be predicted if male harassment in the mating opportunity treatment caused a depressed female immune response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…On the other hand, studies with Callosobruchus seed beetles suggested that the observed reduction in longevity was mostly due to the energetic costs a female sustained in resisting male harassment, and not due to the cost of copulation per se (Ronn et al 2006). In the field cricket G. bimaculatus , significant reductions in female longevity were observed under various levels of male courtship, however, this was not due to compounds in the ejaculate (Bateman et al 2006). Female A. aegypti can reject mating attempts by evasive flight and kicking (Jones 1974; Cator and Harrington 2011), however, the relative costs of rejection versus copulation remain to be determined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Longevity of the female dung fly Sepsis cynipsea was reduced when females were maintained with males (Muhlhauser and Blanckenhorn 2002), and this was largely due to the cost of copulation rather than precopulatory costs of assessment and rejection. In the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus , female longevity was reduced as a result of courtship and copulation, which was not due to receipt of semen (Bateman et al 2006). In contrast, Drosophila females do incur a longevity cost as a result of seminal fluid proteins transferred in the ejaculate (Chapman et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, selection might favour differences in colouration for species recognition in order to prevent energetically costly chasing and courtship displays between species. Both male harassment and courtship often result in reductions in individual fitness (Clutton‐Block & Langley, 1997; Bateman et al. , 2006; Gosden & Svensson, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%