“…Covalently chemical functionalizations are of great importance for nanocarbon materials and their isoelectronic boron nitride (BN) analogues to modulate the band gaps, − improve the biocompatibility, − enhance the performance for energy conversion and storage, − etc. − In particular, the cycloadditions (i.e., (4 + 2) and (2 + 2) reactions) on the conjugated π-surfaces of sp 2 carbon and hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) are one of the most prevalent strategies to achieve functional derivatization. − However, as competing processes, the (2 + 2) and (4 + 2) reactions usually show very similar reactivity and therefore the purification of adducts poses formidable challenges in practice. − Previous theoretical studies have proved that the curvature of fullerenes and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) is a key factor that affects the chemoselectivity of cycloadditions. , That is, the (2 + 2) reaction is preferred for the nanostructure with high curvature (e.g., C 60 and CNTs with small diameters), whereas the (4 + 2) addition is more favored in the case of CNTs with large diameters. Although different selectivities can be detected for nanostructures with different curvatures, obviously, it is still difficult to control the desired reaction pathway and the corresponding adduct at will.…”