2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.0c01384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covalent Functionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes by the Bingel Reaction for Building Charge-Transfer Complexes

Abstract: Functionalization of nanotubes with donor and acceptor partners by the Bingel reaction leads to formation of charge-transfer dyads, which can operate in organic photovoltaic devices. In this work, we theoretically examine the mechanism of the Bingel reaction for (6,5)-chiral, (5,5)armchair, and (9,0)-zig-zag single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), and demonstrate that the reaction is regioselective and takes place at the perpendicular position of (6,5)-and (5,5)-SWCNTs, and oblique position of (9,0)-SWCNT. Fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electronic properties of semiconducting carbon nanotubes, such as HOMO and LUMO energies, and HOMO À LUMO gap, have been demonstrated to converge rapidly within a small number of carbon atoms. [25,26] To estimate the effect of the length of a phenine nanotube on its electronic properties, we considered a series of extended nanotubes based on pNT_ 0d model. The smallest nanotube has 264 carbon atoms, whereas the biggest system is almost twice as large and consists of 504 carbon atoms (Figure 3).…”
Section: Singlet Excited Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electronic properties of semiconducting carbon nanotubes, such as HOMO and LUMO energies, and HOMO À LUMO gap, have been demonstrated to converge rapidly within a small number of carbon atoms. [25,26] To estimate the effect of the length of a phenine nanotube on its electronic properties, we considered a series of extended nanotubes based on pNT_ 0d model. The smallest nanotube has 264 carbon atoms, whereas the biggest system is almost twice as large and consists of 504 carbon atoms (Figure 3).…”
Section: Singlet Excited Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Covalently chemical functionalizations are of great importance for nanocarbon materials and their isoelectronic boron nitride (BN) analogues to modulate the band gaps, improve the biocompatibility, enhance the performance for energy conversion and storage, etc. In particular, the cycloadditions (i.e., (4 + 2) and (2 + 2) reactions) on the conjugated π-surfaces of sp 2 carbon and hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) are one of the most prevalent strategies to achieve functional derivatization. However, as competing processes, the (2 + 2) and (4 + 2) reactions usually show very similar reactivity and therefore the purification of adducts poses formidable challenges in practice. Previous theoretical studies have proved that the curvature of fullerenes and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) is a key factor that affects the chemoselectivity of cycloadditions. , That is, the (2 + 2) reaction is preferred for the nanostructure with high curvature (e.g., C 60 and CNTs with small diameters), whereas the (4 + 2) addition is more favored in the case of CNTs with large diameters. Although different selectivities can be detected for nanostructures with different curvatures, obviously, it is still difficult to control the desired reaction pathway and the corresponding adduct at will.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14) Solà et al investigated cycloaddition reactions in the cylindrical portions of CNTs with different diameters and chirality by density functional theory (DFT) and found that the magnitude of E act depended on the curvature and metallicity. [15][16][17] However, because multiple binding sites exist for these reactions, multiple local minima of the force constants in the reaction coordinates (RC) also exist. 25) In addition, the bonding sites are not necessarily parallel to the diametrical direction of the CNTs, which impedes quantitative evaluation of the relationship between reactivity and curvature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%