2017
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.96.062128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covariance Bell inequalities

Abstract: We introduce Bell inequalities based on covariance, one of the most common measures of correlation. Explicit examples are discussed, and violations in quantum theory are demonstrated. A crucial feature of these covariance Bell inequalities is their nonlinearity; this has nontrivial consequences for the derivation of their local bound, which is not reached by deterministic local correlations. For our simplest inequality, we derive analytically tight bounds for both local and quantum correlations. An interesting… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can see that M(N 3 ) and M(N 4 ) are strict subsets of LM(K); both M(N 1 ) and M(N 2 ) have marginals that are not in M(N 4 ); the set M(N 4 ) consists of marginals that are not compatible with any joint PMF. • We generalize the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality [18] for Pearson correlation coefficients (PCCs), which resolves a conjecture proposed in [19].…”
Section: Contributionssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…We can see that M(N 3 ) and M(N 4 ) are strict subsets of LM(K); both M(N 1 ) and M(N 2 ) have marginals that are not in M(N 4 ); the set M(N 4 ) consists of marginals that are not compatible with any joint PMF. • We generalize the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality [18] for Pearson correlation coefficients (PCCs), which resolves a conjecture proposed in [19].…”
Section: Contributionssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Thus, let us define the associated n-device additive Bell parameter as: 20) and by plugging (20) into (19), we have:…”
Section: Bell and Tsirelson Bounds For The Case Of N =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [31] the authors present novel SOHS representation results for trace polynomials, and use them to build a converging hierarchy of SDP relaxations, which can be used to optimize over trace polynomials. The hierarchy can be practically used in the context of quantum information for finding upper bounds on quantum violations of polynomial Bell inequalities [49] and for characterizing entanglement of Werner states [28]. They also show how to extract minimizers in certain cases.…”
Section: Further Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%