1998
DOI: 10.1006/dspr.1998.0316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covariance Matching Estimation Techniques for Array Signal Processing Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
273
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(278 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
273
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…, where ⊗ denotes the Kronecker product), the weighted LS estimate is asymptotically equivalent to the maximum likelihood estimate [9]. It is straightforward to extend this vectorized formulation to include multiple snapshots over time and frequency to improve the imaging result [8].…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where ⊗ denotes the Kronecker product), the weighted LS estimate is asymptotically equivalent to the maximum likelihood estimate [9]. It is straightforward to extend this vectorized formulation to include multiple snapshots over time and frequency to improve the imaging result [8].…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We choose the individual sparsity regularization parameter as the one that is optimal for the infinite number of obtained snapshots. This parameter choice allows us to reformulate the problem as a purely group Lasso problem and make a connection to the Covariance Matching Estimation Technique (COMET) framework from [20] to determine the second regularization parameter for the group sparsity, based on the noise in the system. We compare the performance of the system with conventional methods for wideband direction of arrival estimation.…”
Section: This Paper Is a Revised And Expanded Version Of The Paper Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the problem of estimating the covariance matrix Σ of a random vector x with components x[n] when it is known that Σ is a linear combination of the matrices in the set S. This problem has a long history and a wide range of applications [1], [2]. Now consider a modification of the same problem where only a subset of the samples x[n] is available, i.e., when the observations are y[m] = x[n m ] for some I = {n 0 , n 1 , .…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%