2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cover shields for sub-ambient radiative cooling: A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the temperature difference Δ T of Sample 1 and Sample 2 are 7.6 and 8.1 °C, respectively (Figure S7, Supporting Information), with an estimated net cooling power of 130.35 and 138.17 W m –2 , respectively, under the same non‐radiative heat losses of h cc = 12 W m –2 K –1 . More importantly, in the ideal limit of no convection and conduction losses ( h cc = 0 W m –2 K –1 ), [ 42,43 ] the model returns a remarkable 32.9 °C temperature drop in the daytime temperature for Sample 3, suggesting that the designed radiative cooler should retain a high cooling potential if additional IR‐transparent insulation is applied to it. [ 43,44 ] In comparison, an ideal sample (null absorption between 0.25 and 2.5 µm and unit emissivity between 2.5 and 25 µm, see Figure S8, Supporting Information) shows an 11.6 °C temperature drop, while the bulk SiO 2 cannot be cooled as its curve value is negative at equilibrium.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the temperature difference Δ T of Sample 1 and Sample 2 are 7.6 and 8.1 °C, respectively (Figure S7, Supporting Information), with an estimated net cooling power of 130.35 and 138.17 W m –2 , respectively, under the same non‐radiative heat losses of h cc = 12 W m –2 K –1 . More importantly, in the ideal limit of no convection and conduction losses ( h cc = 0 W m –2 K –1 ), [ 42,43 ] the model returns a remarkable 32.9 °C temperature drop in the daytime temperature for Sample 3, suggesting that the designed radiative cooler should retain a high cooling potential if additional IR‐transparent insulation is applied to it. [ 43,44 ] In comparison, an ideal sample (null absorption between 0.25 and 2.5 µm and unit emissivity between 2.5 and 25 µm, see Figure S8, Supporting Information) shows an 11.6 °C temperature drop, while the bulk SiO 2 cannot be cooled as its curve value is negative at equilibrium.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, it required larger areas of radiative coolers to produce a sufficient cooling capacity, which inevitably resulted in the improved cost. [ 4,136–138 ] Therefore, it is highly urgent to develop the facile strategies to further enhance radiative cooling performance. [ 139,140 ] Some reports have revealed that aerogel materials can markedly reduce nonradiative heat exchange, resulting in great temperature drop with the ambient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A polyethylene (PE) film is commonly used as the cover, and this makes the conventional RC emitter not durable. Thus, a durable cover shield for the RC itself is now one of the pursued topics in the RC research [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also worth mentioning that the roof SC-RC ventilation implemented in this strategy has a notable difference from the conventional RC emitter, i.e., we eliminate the convection cover. This elimination of convection cover aims to avoid the use of short-lived material and thus make this SC-RC system more durable because most of the RC emitter materials are more durable than the commonly used cover material such as polyethylene (PE) [48][49][50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%