2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2827026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coverage Analysis of Millimeter Wave Decode-and-Forward Networks With Best Relay Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the aid of relay, the performance of secondary users in the cognitive network can be improved [21]; the physical layer security in the largescale fifth-generation network can be strengthened [22]; the energy efficiency and link reliability for the vehicular ad hoc networks can be enhanced [23]; the cellular coverage area can be extended via multihop D2D communications [6,7,24], especially for the millimeter-wave-based systems [25][26][27] and Internet-of-Things [28]; the high quality transmissions for the sensor network can be achieved [29] as well. However, based on the finding of this paper, the achievable diversity gain via relay transmissions will be seriously diluted under the masquerading attack.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the aid of relay, the performance of secondary users in the cognitive network can be improved [21]; the physical layer security in the largescale fifth-generation network can be strengthened [22]; the energy efficiency and link reliability for the vehicular ad hoc networks can be enhanced [23]; the cellular coverage area can be extended via multihop D2D communications [6,7,24], especially for the millimeter-wave-based systems [25][26][27] and Internet-of-Things [28]; the high quality transmissions for the sensor network can be achieved [29] as well. However, based on the finding of this paper, the achievable diversity gain via relay transmissions will be seriously diluted under the masquerading attack.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the decode-and-forward relaying strategy, we adopt an opportunistic relay selection scheme with two phases. First, we select a set of UAV relays, which can successfully decode the messages received from S. Specifically, for a potential UAV relay R x ∈ Φ U , if the channel capacity between S and R x is greater than a threshold C th , the relay R x can decode the S's messages correctly [35,36], and the decoding set is defined asΦ = {R x ∈ Φ U , C SR x > C th }. After that, the UAV relay R 0 , which provides the lowest path loss to D, is selected fromΦ to forward the S's messages to D. To this end, the selected relay offers the minimum length of LOS or NLOS link to D.…”
Section: Relay Selection and Transmission Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal noise density is −174 dBm/Hz [27] and devices are using 18 dBm transmit power. Capacity of each link (i, j) at time t is C t ij = B · log 2 (1 + S t ij ) bits/sec, where B = 20 M Hz is bandwidth and SNR threshold S th ij is taken to be 20 dB [28]. We are assuming fixed packet length of 65535 bytes.…”
Section: Simulation Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%