2017 IEEE 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/vtcspring.2017.8108666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coverage and Capacity Analysis of Sigfox, LoRa, GPRS, and NB-IoT

Abstract: In this paper the coverage and capacity of SigFox, LoRa, GPRS, and NB-IoT is compared using a real site deployment covering 8000 km 2 in Northern Denmark. Using the existing Telenor cellular site grid it is shown that the four technologies have more than 99 % outdoor coverage, while GPRS is challenged for indoor coverage. Furthermore, the study analyzes the capacity of the four technologies assuming a traffic growth from 1 to 10 IoT device per user. The conclusion is that the 95 %-tile uplink failure rate for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
100
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
100
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the narrow bandwidth, the maximum uplink throughput that can be achieved is only 100 bps. Also, regional regulations impose a limited duty cycle of 1%, i.e., 36 s per hour and six seconds per message [12]. Therefore, the daily limit for a Sigfox device equals 140 uplink messages (twelve bytes each) and four downlink messages (eight bytes each).…”
Section: Sigfoxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the narrow bandwidth, the maximum uplink throughput that can be achieved is only 100 bps. Also, regional regulations impose a limited duty cycle of 1%, i.e., 36 s per hour and six seconds per message [12]. Therefore, the daily limit for a Sigfox device equals 140 uplink messages (twelve bytes each) and four downlink messages (eight bytes each).…”
Section: Sigfoxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SigFox is provided by the SIGFOX company that was founded by the Ludovic Le Moan and Christophe Fourtet in 2009. As a LPWA technology worked on non-licensed spectrum, SigFox has been rapidly commercialized and provides network devices with ultra-narrowband technology [12]. Different from mobile communication technology, it is a protocol that aims to create wireless IoT special networks with low power consumption and low costs.…”
Section: Sigfoxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Table 2 we can observe how SIGFOX TM requires 20 times fewer antennas to cover the same urban environment than GSM, also having higher signal penetration into buildings. Regarding signal penetration into buildings, simulations considering a populated area in Denmark returned an indoor building penetration about 40% for General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) and higher than 95% for SIGFOX TM [21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%