2017
DOI: 10.1002/jgt.22219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covering 2‐connected 3‐regular graphs with disjoint paths

Abstract: A path cover of a graph is a set of disjoint paths so that every vertex in the graph is contained in one of the paths. The path cover number p(G) of graph G is the cardinality of a path cover with the minimum number of paths. Reed in 1996 conjectured that a 2‐connected 3‐regular graph has path cover number at most ⌈n/10⌉. In this article, we confirm this conjecture.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conjecture might seem far-fetched, given that Reed [28] claims that there exist 2-connnected cubic graphs G with µ(G) ≥ ⌈ n 10 ⌉ and by Claim 1.3 ml(G) ≥ µ(G) + 1 always holds. However, Reed's example only gives graphs with µ(G) ≥ ⌈ n 20 ⌉, as pointed out by Yu [35]. Yu also gives 2-connnected cubic graphs G with µ(G) ≥ ⌈ n 14 ⌉ in Theorem 1.2 of [35] and this is the best known bound to date (later we prove that Yu's graphs have path covering number exactly n 14 ).…”
Section: General Casementioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This conjecture might seem far-fetched, given that Reed [28] claims that there exist 2-connnected cubic graphs G with µ(G) ≥ ⌈ n 10 ⌉ and by Claim 1.3 ml(G) ≥ µ(G) + 1 always holds. However, Reed's example only gives graphs with µ(G) ≥ ⌈ n 20 ⌉, as pointed out by Yu [35]. Yu also gives 2-connnected cubic graphs G with µ(G) ≥ ⌈ n 14 ⌉ in Theorem 1.2 of [35] and this is the best known bound to date (later we prove that Yu's graphs have path covering number exactly n 14 ).…”
Section: General Casementioning
confidence: 70%
“…However, Reed's example only gives graphs with µ(G) ≥ ⌈ n 20 ⌉, as pointed out by Yu [35]. Yu also gives 2-connnected cubic graphs G with µ(G) ≥ ⌈ n 14 ⌉ in Theorem 1.2 of [35] and this is the best known bound to date (later we prove that Yu's graphs have path covering number exactly n 14 ). In order to prove that Conjecture 3.1 is sharp, let G be the graph obtained from a cycle of length k by substituting all vertices of the cycle by an edgedeleted Petersen graph P ′ (that is, P ′ is a graph obtained from the Petersen graph by deleting an edge), such that the edges of the cycle are connected to the vertices that are incident with the deleted edge of the respective copy of P ′ (see Figure 1).…”
Section: General Casementioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The path cover number of regular graphs [15] are also discussed. Recently, Chen et al [4] gave the following result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Magnant et al [MWY16] showed some upper bounds for general graphs depending on the maximum and minimum degree of the graph. In 2017, Yu [Yu18], motivated by the conjecture of Reed [Ree96], showed an upper bound of n 10 for the minimum path cover number in cubic 2-connected graphs. Although this is the same bound conjectured by Reed, Yu showed that the example given by Reed was not correct.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%