Abstract:International audienceWe introduce and study a semigroup structure on the set of irreducible components of the Hurwitz space of marked coverings of a complex projective curve with given Galois group of the coverings and fixed ramification type. As application, we give new conditions on the ramification type that are sufficient for irreducibil-ity of the Hurwitz spaces, suggest some bounds on the number of irreducibility components under certain more general conditions, and show that the number of irreducible c… Show more
“…, g r ). A description of the Hurwitz action, together with example of monodromies, can be found in [5] and a point of view on the study of the connected components of the Hurwitz schemes by means of semigroups over groups is carried out in [14]. Notice that if the group G is the alternating group A n , then N Sn (A n ) is the whole S n , because A n is unique in its conjugacy class.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Valentiner group is described as the subgroup of S 18 generated by {v 1 , v 2 } = {(2, 6)(4, 11) (7,9) (8,13) (10,14) (12,16), (1,2,7,4) (3,8,6,10) (5,9,13,12) (11,15) (14,17) (16,18)…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cases [4] and [5] are equivalent to Case [2], this can achieved by conjugating (1, 4) (5,6), (2,5) (3,6) in [4] and (1, 6)(4, 5), (2, 3) (5,6) in [5]. Eventually, [3.2] is equivalent to [3.1] by using φ (,) 14 .…”
Section: Curve Of Genus Zero Case Of Five Pointsmentioning
Abstract. We study the components of the Hurwitz scheme of ramified coverings of P 1 with monodromy given by the alternating group A6 and elements in the conjugacy class of product of two disjoint cycles. In order to detect the connected components of the Hurwitz scheme, inspired by the case of the spin structures studied by Fried for the 3-cycles, we use as invariant the lifting to the Valentiner group, triple covering of A6. We prove that the Hurwitz scheme has two irreducible components when the genus of the covering is greater than zero, in accordance with the asymptotic solution found by Bogomolov and Kulikov.
“…, g r ). A description of the Hurwitz action, together with example of monodromies, can be found in [5] and a point of view on the study of the connected components of the Hurwitz schemes by means of semigroups over groups is carried out in [14]. Notice that if the group G is the alternating group A n , then N Sn (A n ) is the whole S n , because A n is unique in its conjugacy class.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Valentiner group is described as the subgroup of S 18 generated by {v 1 , v 2 } = {(2, 6)(4, 11) (7,9) (8,13) (10,14) (12,16), (1,2,7,4) (3,8,6,10) (5,9,13,12) (11,15) (14,17) (16,18)…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cases [4] and [5] are equivalent to Case [2], this can achieved by conjugating (1, 4) (5,6), (2,5) (3,6) in [4] and (1, 6)(4, 5), (2, 3) (5,6) in [5]. Eventually, [3.2] is equivalent to [3.1] by using φ (,) 14 .…”
Section: Curve Of Genus Zero Case Of Five Pointsmentioning
Abstract. We study the components of the Hurwitz scheme of ramified coverings of P 1 with monodromy given by the alternating group A6 and elements in the conjugacy class of product of two disjoint cycles. In order to detect the connected components of the Hurwitz scheme, inspired by the case of the spin structures studied by Fried for the 3-cycles, we use as invariant the lifting to the Valentiner group, triple covering of A6. We prove that the Hurwitz scheme has two irreducible components when the genus of the covering is greater than zero, in accordance with the asymptotic solution found by Bogomolov and Kulikov.
“…This result was extended in [55] to covers of a fixed curve Y of genus ≥ 1. The papers [37,38,6] are devoted to determining the number of connected components of the Hurwitz spaces when every n i of the branching data is large enough. The paper [31] extends the connectivity result of Clebsch and Hurwitz to Hurwitz spaces of Galois covers of P 1 with Galois group isomorphic to a Weyl group and branching data consisting of reflections.…”
Given a smooth, projective curve \(Y\), a finite group \(G\) and a positive integer $n$ we study smooth, proper families \(X\to Y\times S\to S\) of Galois covers of \(Y\) with Galois group isomorphic to $G$ branched in \(n\) points, parameterized by algebraic varieties \(S\). When \(G\) is with trivial center we prove that the Hurwitz space \(H^G_n(Y)\) is a fine moduli variety for this moduli problem and construct explicitly the universal family. For arbitrary \(G\) we prove that \(H^G_n(Y)\) is a coarse moduli variety. For families of pointed Galois covers of \((Y,y_0)\) we prove that the Hurwitz space \(H^G_n(Y,y_0)\) is a fine moduli variety, and construct explicitly the universal family, for arbitrary group \(G\). We use classical tools of algebraic topology and of complex algebraic geometry.
In [10], the ambiguity index a (G,O) was introduced for each equipped finite group (G, O). It is equal to the number of connected components of a Hurwitz space parametrizing coverings of a projective line with Galois group G assuming that all local monodromies belong to conjugacy classes O in G and the number of branch points is greater than some constant. We prove in this article that the ambiguity index can be identified with the size of a generalization of so called Bogomolov multiplier ([8], see also [1]) and hence can be easily computed for many pairs (G, O).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.