COVID‐19: A systems perspective on opportunities for better health outcomes

Abstract

COVID‐19 has disrupted social and spatial life. In this work, I argue that such disruption provides an opportunity for all tiers of government to reassess collective priorities and reorient societal goals to work towards better health outcomes for all. I offer a systems thinking perspective to show how societal goals such as economic growth are supported by “system rules” created by governments—the same rules largely responsible for prevailing inequities and preventable chronic, noncommunicable diseases and conditions. The work is significant because it shows how the disruption caused by COVID‐19 changed deep system leverage points, highlighting places inside governmental systems susceptible and acceptable to change and revealing how systems can be reoriented. It draws on empirical data from one subnational jurisdiction of Australia. Specifically, in late 2020, 81 Tasmanian local government personnel shared views on diverse governmental changes made in response to the pandemic. Most participants wanted those changes to continue because of their net benefits to health and social, economic, and environmental outcomes more broadly. They expressed overwhelming support for actions to improve the social determinants of health and communicable and noncommunicable disease prevention and management. I conclude that unless such efforts for change continue, poor health outcomes and health inequities are likely to be exacerbated and argue that a shared systems goal to create a wellbeing economy could reorient systems to achieve better health outcomes for all.

Geographies of COVID‐19

“…Operating at a similar scale, Morgan (2022) explores local government responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic in Tasmania. She opens her analysis by noting Datu’s (2020) editorial in Geographical Research , which suggests that the “geographical study of local government is fundamental to understanding how questions of power, politics, and public services play out across individual places and communities within a nation or state” (p. 304).…”

Valuing the archive for research and learning and teaching in geography

“…These several original articles are rounded off by our final special commentary on COVID‐19 in which Morgan (2022) considers a systems perspective on opportunities for better health outcomes in Tasmania. As readers will know, we have published several such commentaries, and these are to be brought together in a virtual issue with editorial commentaries by Dallas Rogers and Matthew Kearnes in 2023.…”

Global crisis governance in response to scientific information: Comparing and understanding regulatory responses from WHO and IPCC concerning the COVID-19 and climate crises

“…So far, the application of systems theory to the COVID-19 and climate crisis is limited. Morgan (2022) and McConnell (2021) argue for a systems-thinking approach to recognize COVID-19 and place major social or global health challenges into the wider societal context. Applying a Luhmannian systems-theory perspective, Le Ravalec et al (2022) suggest that the economic system is unable to properly capture messages from its environment on climate change.…”