2021
DOI: 10.24926/iip.v12i1.3555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covid Media Misguidance: A Case Report Highlighting the Influence of Media on Patient Medication Decision Making

Abstract: Purpose: This case report details the influence of media on patients and the responsibility of health care providers to educate their patients on proper use of medications, and to be aware of potential misadventures based on messages in popular media. Summary: The sudden rise of the COVID19 pandemic has led to media outlets reporting science without necessary peer review and has resulted in preliminary data presented as factual evidence. It is difficult for patients without an extensive medical background in s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The international literature has extensively highlighted the problem of the infodemic in managing information related to COVID-19 since the very first months of the pandemic. Studies on the ways in which the media have handled the COVID-19 pandemic have already accounted for some important aspects, including the biases that characterise mass information [45] (AlAfnan, 2020), among which stigma and incitement to hatred emerge in importance [46] (Robie, Krishnamurthi, 2020), but have also underlined the ability to give scientifically correct information [47] (Anderson et al, 2021). They then considered effects from the resulting increase in perceived risk of contagion as well, including depression [48] (Olagoke et al, 2020), worry and fear [49,50] (Garfin et al, 2020; Manzoor & Safdar, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The international literature has extensively highlighted the problem of the infodemic in managing information related to COVID-19 since the very first months of the pandemic. Studies on the ways in which the media have handled the COVID-19 pandemic have already accounted for some important aspects, including the biases that characterise mass information [45] (AlAfnan, 2020), among which stigma and incitement to hatred emerge in importance [46] (Robie, Krishnamurthi, 2020), but have also underlined the ability to give scientifically correct information [47] (Anderson et al, 2021). They then considered effects from the resulting increase in perceived risk of contagion as well, including depression [48] (Olagoke et al, 2020), worry and fear [49,50] (Garfin et al, 2020; Manzoor & Safdar, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, swathes of scientific data were released through open‐access journals and even group websites that rapidly became news headlines. Of course, such trying times are, in fact, when peer reviewing, correct use of trial design/statistics/planning [353] and our faith in the scientific process and the drug approval pipeline should be highest. These lessons should be learned by scientists, and indeed also politicians and journalists alike [354] .…”
Section: A Commitment To Introspective Science Reporting and Collaborative Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%