SAE Technical Paper Series 1998
DOI: 10.4271/981587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CPL and LHP Technologies: What are the Differences, What are the Similarities?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The working fluid mass affects the performance characteristics of the LHP and its start-up behavior [9]. However, an experimental approach to find the optimal fill quantity proved to be the more appropriate solution in this case.…”
Section: Working Fluid Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The working fluid mass affects the performance characteristics of the LHP and its start-up behavior [9]. However, an experimental approach to find the optimal fill quantity proved to be the more appropriate solution in this case.…”
Section: Working Fluid Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Separating the compensation reservoir from the remaining part of the system makes the CPL more tolerant to heat loss, which facilitates its installation. Detailed descriptions of CPL systems can be found in [10][11], for instance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different designs of LHPs and CPLs have been developed and tested, (Maydanik, 2005;Nikitkin and Cullimore, 1998;Goncharov and Kolesnikov, 2002;Ku, 1999) and such devices have been used as key apparatuses of thermal control of spacecrafts such as GLAS, EOS-Chemistry, GOES and SWIFT. While LHP technologies have reached a certain level of maturity, many issues still remain as subjects of intensive research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%