2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2013.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CPT based prediction of foundation penetration in siliceous sand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For cone penetration tests in soft clays, the undrained shear strength of soil, s u , can be deduced from the net penetration resistance by means of a theoretical or calibrated bearing factor N kt . The bearing factor has been investigated using various ALE approaches with implicit or explicit schemes [42,41,18,19,25]. Here, a benchmark case in Walker and Yu [42,41] was replicated: a standard cone with projected area of A = 1000 mm 2 (shaft diameter D = 35.7 mm) and apex angle of 60°was penetrated into weightless clay (though a density has to be specified for the CEL analysis as this influences the initial estimate of stiffness and hence the critical time step) under undrained conditions; the cone was assumed to be smooth; the soil strength was uniform with s u = 10 kPa; and the soil rigidity index G/s u = 100, where G is the elastic shear modulus.…”
Section: Cone Penetrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For cone penetration tests in soft clays, the undrained shear strength of soil, s u , can be deduced from the net penetration resistance by means of a theoretical or calibrated bearing factor N kt . The bearing factor has been investigated using various ALE approaches with implicit or explicit schemes [42,41,18,19,25]. Here, a benchmark case in Walker and Yu [42,41] was replicated: a standard cone with projected area of A = 1000 mm 2 (shaft diameter D = 35.7 mm) and apex angle of 60°was penetrated into weightless clay (though a density has to be specified for the CEL analysis as this influences the initial estimate of stiffness and hence the critical time step) under undrained conditions; the cone was assumed to be smooth; the soil strength was uniform with s u = 10 kPa; and the soil rigidity index G/s u = 100, where G is the elastic shear modulus.…”
Section: Cone Penetrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to RITSS and EALE, an element in CEL may be occupied by multiple materials fully or partially, with the material interface and boundaries approximated by volume fractions of each material in the element. The CEL method has been used by a number of researchers to investigate the penetration of spudcan foundations in various soil stratigraphies [27,35,36,25,12] and uplift capacity of rectangular plates [9]. The comparatively rigid structural part (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The threshold shear strains were taken as ε p ep = 4% and ε crit ep = 10%, as observed broadly in triaxial compression tests on silica sand by Pucker et al (2013) and as adopted by Hu et al (2015). The critical friction angle was taken as 34° ( Cheong, 2002;O'Loughlin & Lehane, 2003;Hossain, 2014), while the initial and peak friction angles were selected based on the theories as follows.…”
Section: Analysis Details and Model Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The updated friction and dilation angles remain constant during the next step. In the following analysis, the threshold shear strains were taken as ξ p ¼ 4% and ξ cv ¼ 10%, as observed broadly in triaxial compression tests on super-fine silica sand by Pucker et al (2013). Similar super-fine silica sands were used in the centrifuge tests of Teh et al (2008Teh et al ( , 2010, Lee et al (2013a) and Hu et al (2014a).…”
Section: Sand Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%