2021
DOI: 10.3233/jifs-202954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CPT-MABAC method for spherical fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making and its application to green supplier selection

Abstract: The green supplier selection is one of the popular multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems. The spherical fuzzy sets (SFSs) can fully express the complexity and fuzziness of evaluation information for green supplier selection. Furthermore, the classic MABAC (multi-attributive border approximation area comparison) method based on the cumulative prospect theory (CPT-MABAC) is designed, which is an optional method in reflecting the psychological perceptions of decision makers (DMs). Therefore, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But in the actual decision, many complex information forms may appear in the evaluation process due to the uncertainty of DMs and the diversity of attributes, such as spherical linguistic FSs (Ashraf et al 2018 ), spherical soft FSs (Perveen et al 2019 ), T-spherical hesitant FSs (Al-Quran 2021 ) and interval-valued T-SFSs (Garg et al 2022 ). Therefore, in future studies, we will also focus on the further extension of the CPT–CoCoSo method in the aforementioned environment to develop more MAGDM models for dealing with various uncertain problems (Zhang et al 2021 ; Liu et al 2021 ; Wu et al 2014 ; Lu et al 2019 ; Wang et al 2019b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But in the actual decision, many complex information forms may appear in the evaluation process due to the uncertainty of DMs and the diversity of attributes, such as spherical linguistic FSs (Ashraf et al 2018 ), spherical soft FSs (Perveen et al 2019 ), T-spherical hesitant FSs (Al-Quran 2021 ) and interval-valued T-SFSs (Garg et al 2022 ). Therefore, in future studies, we will also focus on the further extension of the CPT–CoCoSo method in the aforementioned environment to develop more MAGDM models for dealing with various uncertain problems (Zhang et al 2021 ; Liu et al 2021 ; Wu et al 2014 ; Lu et al 2019 ; Wang et al 2019b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MABAC method is used in different studies in the literature. This method is used for location selection (Bozanic et al 2019), third-party logistic provider selection (Pamucar et al 2019), portfolio selection (Biswas et al 2019), assessment of programming language (Mishra et al 2020), green supplier selection (Wei et al 2020), selection of emergency alternatives (Liang et al 2020) (Zhang et al 2021) and site selection (Wu et al 2021).…”
Section: Mabac Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the fuzzy MABAC approach was implemented for solving decision-making problems encountered in various fields. The main focal points of these papers can be summarized as follows: evaluation of the efficiency of social media using (Sun et al, 2019;Bobar et al, 2020), Risk assessment of rockburst (Liang et al, 2019), Assessment of undergraduate teaching (Gong et al, 2019), strategy selection for health tourism (Büyüközkan et al, 2020), the selection of location for the construction of single-span bailey bridge (Božanić et al, 2019), green supplier selection (Zhang et al, 2021), Selection of fire position of mortar units (Jokić et al, 2021), Selection of commercially available electric vehicle (Biswas & Das, 2019). As a result, studies focusing on logistics villages from the perspective of logistics companies and operators' preferences are limited.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%