2017
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2016.2606557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CPW-Fed Wideband Circularly Polarized Printed Monopole Antenna With Open Loop and Asymmetric Ground Plane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen from the table, the proposed antenna is slightly larger than those of other antennas, but the large size is the common drawback of monopole antennas. Although the antenna in has a larger impedance bandwidth than the proposed design, the AR bandwidth is relative narrow, leading to a narrow overlapping bandwidth for use. In contrast, the proposed antenna has both wide impedance and AR bandwidths, which are the competitive advantages over other antennas.…”
Section: Exprimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen from the table, the proposed antenna is slightly larger than those of other antennas, but the large size is the common drawback of monopole antennas. Although the antenna in has a larger impedance bandwidth than the proposed design, the AR bandwidth is relative narrow, leading to a narrow overlapping bandwidth for use. In contrast, the proposed antenna has both wide impedance and AR bandwidths, which are the competitive advantages over other antennas.…”
Section: Exprimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Reference , a C‐shaped monopole antenna obtained a 65.2% AR bandwidth by loading a square loop and an adjusting stub on the ground plane. In Reference , a CPW‐fed rectangular patch shaped monopole achieved CP radiation with 63.3% AR bandwidth by using an asymmetric ground plane of different heights in addition with loading a parasitic square loop. Although the antennas achieved wide AR bandwidth, the geometry structures are a little complicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Reference , a T‐shaped slot is created on the ground and an X‐shaped slot is etched on an annular monopole to achieve 4.02%, 4.51%, 1%, and 12.74% bandwidths. In References 12 and 13, a technique of using an open loop parasitic element along with a modified monopole produced wideband CP results of 65.2% and 63.3%, respectively. Some of these designs have relatively smaller axial ratio (AR) bandwidths or suffer from design and fabrication complexities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related works have been reported in [16][17][18] where the proposed antenna has been simulated and characterized in the free space environment. In [16], the proposed broadband monopole CP antenna consists of a C-shaped monopole with an open-loop placed on the backside.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of gain enhancement is done using a U-shaped ground plane to enhance the capacitive coupling and directivity and also to reduce the size of the antenna. In a CPWfed CP monopole antenna [17], the CP is initially achieved by utilizing the asymmetric ground, and then a rectangular open loop is introduced to obtain wide-impedance bandwidth and broadband circular polarization characteristics. In [18], a CPW-fed dual-band and dual-sense monopole CP antenna has two rectangular parasitic elements and an I-shape grounded stub to achieve the desired circular polarization characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%