2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack equivalent concept applied to the fracture characterization of bonded joints under pure mode I loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
130
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
130
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean values of critical fracture energy of maximum point criteria were achieved as G IIIC = 232.5 (J/mm 2 ). In theory, it may seem that the values are representative of fracture initiation; therefore, the measured critical mode-III strain energy release rate should be constant with insert crack lengths if mode-III strain energy value is considered as a natural attribute of adhesive joints whereas fracture toughness of mode-I and mode-II conditions in Pre-crack adhesive joints indicated Stable R-curve behavior so that fracture toughness could be introduced by a constant value [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean values of critical fracture energy of maximum point criteria were achieved as G IIIC = 232.5 (J/mm 2 ). In theory, it may seem that the values are representative of fracture initiation; therefore, the measured critical mode-III strain energy release rate should be constant with insert crack lengths if mode-III strain energy value is considered as a natural attribute of adhesive joints whereas fracture toughness of mode-I and mode-II conditions in Pre-crack adhesive joints indicated Stable R-curve behavior so that fracture toughness could be introduced by a constant value [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fracture characterization of bonded joints under pure mode-I has been extensively studied by several authors. Double cantilever beam (DCB) and tapered DCB (TDCB) tests are the most widely used methods for measuring mode-I fracture toughness [1][2][3][4]. Three-point bending of adhesively bonded end notched flexure (ENF) has shown to be the preferred test technique for obtaining mode-II critical strain energy release rate [5][6][7][8][9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since, crack propagation is an energy based prediction, then magnitude J ic should correspond to the steady-state fracture toughness level. Nevertheless, the adhesive material used herein, Araldite 2015, does not have a typical R-curve for Mode I and Mode II, meaning that the initial and steady-state fracture toughness levels cannot be distinguished, as concluded in [37,45].…”
Section: Finite Element Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) is defined from the experimentally measured values of Young's modulus (E = 1850 MPa) and shear modulus (G = 650 MPa) [29], as detailed in the work of Campilho et al [28]. In the present work, the cohesive laws of the adhesive layer in pure modes I and II were estimated by Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) (mode I) and End-Notched Flexure (ENF) (mode II) tests using an inverse data fitting procedure [30][31][32]. This course of action is supported by the typically varying mechanical properties of adhesive layers with t A , diverging also to the adhesive bulk properties [25].…”
Section: Cohesive Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%