2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack growth behavior of 7075-T6 under biaxial tension–tension fatigue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 11, 22 ] The introduction of stress parallel to the crack direction will reduce the size of the plasticity zone at the crack tip even if under the same stress intensity factor. [ 23 ] Under the same ∆K Ι , further increasing biaxial stress ratio λ causes the sequent decrease of biaxial FCG rate, however, the influence of biaxial stress ratio gradually decreases. It can be attributed to the instability of the crack propagation path.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 11, 22 ] The introduction of stress parallel to the crack direction will reduce the size of the plasticity zone at the crack tip even if under the same stress intensity factor. [ 23 ] Under the same ∆K Ι , further increasing biaxial stress ratio λ causes the sequent decrease of biaxial FCG rate, however, the influence of biaxial stress ratio gradually decreases. It can be attributed to the instability of the crack propagation path.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to study the crack propagation behaviour under biaxial loading conditions, many researchers have done lots of works. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Misak et al 11,12 investigated the mixed-mode FCGR in cruciform specimens with a 45 inclined centre notch under various mixed-mode biaxial loading conditions. They have reported that the FCGR in biaxial tension fatigue with higher biaxiality ratio is faster than that with lower biaxiality ratio at a given crack driving force level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taylor and Lee 9 investigated the biaxiality ratio effects on FCG behavior by using cruciform‐shaped samples made of 1100‐H14 and 7075‐T651 aluminum alloys and concluded that non‐singular stress along the direction of crack has effects on the trajectory of FCG and fatigue life of the structures made of mentioned aluminum alloys under both in‐phase and out of phase biaxial loading. Misak et al 10 presented the FCG of Al‐7,075‐T6 under biaxial loads when both applied stresses were tensile in nature. He reported that crack initiation and growth is coplanar with the initial crack under equibiaxial loading condition and it is noncoplanar for the case when λ = 1.5, whereas the higher rate of FCG will be observed in case of a higher value of λ, for example, 1.5 as compared to the case of uniaxial fatigue or biaxial fatigue with a lower value of λ, for example, 0.5 or 1 under a certain level of crack driving force in air environment 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%