2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack initiation mechanism of extruded AZ31 magnesium alloy in the very high cycle fatigue regime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
77
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
9
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The investigated alloy displayed a fatigue behaviour comparable or even better than that of other rare earth rich sand cast magnesium alloys; in fact, a fatigue strength of 98 MPa was measured on the AM-SC1 alloy (Mg-Nd 1.7-Other RE 1.0-Zn 0.5 Zn-Zr 0.50 ) [42], while the NZ30K2 alloy (Mg-Nd 2.8-Zn 0.19-Zr 0.50) [12] showed a fatigue strength of 84 MPa (15% lower compared to that measured on the present alloy). It is also worth noting that the fatigue strength of the EV31A alloy used in the present study is comparable with that of the most common wrought magnesium alloy AZ31 [43]. The excellent fatigue response shown by the investigated alloy can be mainly ascribed to the soundness of the specimens, also due to a careful control of the sand casting process; in fact, no solidification defects were detected close to the free surface of the samples, which experiences the maximum stresses, or in the bulk.…”
Section: Fatigue Testssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The investigated alloy displayed a fatigue behaviour comparable or even better than that of other rare earth rich sand cast magnesium alloys; in fact, a fatigue strength of 98 MPa was measured on the AM-SC1 alloy (Mg-Nd 1.7-Other RE 1.0-Zn 0.5 Zn-Zr 0.50 ) [42], while the NZ30K2 alloy (Mg-Nd 2.8-Zn 0.19-Zr 0.50) [12] showed a fatigue strength of 84 MPa (15% lower compared to that measured on the present alloy). It is also worth noting that the fatigue strength of the EV31A alloy used in the present study is comparable with that of the most common wrought magnesium alloy AZ31 [43]. The excellent fatigue response shown by the investigated alloy can be mainly ascribed to the soundness of the specimens, also due to a careful control of the sand casting process; in fact, no solidification defects were detected close to the free surface of the samples, which experiences the maximum stresses, or in the bulk.…”
Section: Fatigue Testssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…When the specimens were subjected to a stress higher than the compressive and tensile yield stress in the load-controlled fatigue test, deformation twins were observed in the extruded magnesium alloys. 3,4,26) In contrast, free deformation twins are observed around the fatigue crack path (within the Fatigue Crack Propagation Behavior of Textured Polycrystalline Magnesium Alloysplastic zone) in the L-T, L-S, and E-R specimens (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is believed that the underlying reason for the increase of yield strength and the decrease of ductility after the closed-die forging is the grain refining impact of the process (Figure 2). In fact, the forged alloy is exhibiting higher strength in the wake of its finer grains, thereby higher strength according to the Hall-Petch relation [24]. On the other hand, grain refinement yields higher density of grain boundaries that augments the impedance to the dislocation movement.…”
Section: Microstructure Texture and Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%