2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.02.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack nucleation in negative geometries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 shows the case of a non monotonic variation of G inc , i.e. G inc attains a maximum for a crack surface S m [9,29,42]. In most cases, crack initiation surface verifies S * < S m (Fig.…”
Section: G(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 shows the case of a non monotonic variation of G inc , i.e. G inc attains a maximum for a crack surface S m [9,29,42]. In most cases, crack initiation surface verifies S * < S m (Fig.…”
Section: G(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is physically sound and requires only the fundamental material parameters strength (σ c , τ c ) and toughness (G Ic , G IIc ) as input. In particular, no assumptions on initial defects or numerical stabilization or regularization parameters are necessary (Weißgraeber et al, 2016b;Rosendahl et al, 2019a). Equation 8is a unified criterion for crack nucleation and crack growth.…”
Section: General Coupled Stress and Energy Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FFM approaches have been applied to different geometries, materials, and loading conditions. Some recent applications include, among the others, the failure behaviour of metals even under moderate or large scale yielding, the investigation of three‐dimensional effects, the description of T‐stress effects on the straight and curved crack deflection, and the study of crack nucleation in negative geometries …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent applications include, among the others, the failure behaviour of metals even under moderate or large scale yielding, [12][13][14][15] the investigation of threedimensional effects, [16][17][18] the description of T-stress effects on the straight and curved crack deflection, 19,20 and the study of crack nucleation in negative geometries. 21 From the comparison between theoretical predictions and experimental data, it is generally difficult to determine which TCD criterion predicts more accurately the failure initiation, as the situation changes for each experimental test. From one point of view, the implementation of stress or energy-based criteria generally results more simple, because only one equation has to be solved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%