2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack Propagation in Additive Manufactured Materials and Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Riemer and Richard investigated the effects of build‐up rate (cm 3 /h) on the crack growth behaviour of SLM 316L steel. Crack growth testing showed a huge decrease in threshold values, Δ K th , when increasing the build‐up rate: 3.8 MPa m 1/2 for 30‐μm layer thickness with 175‐W laser power to 2.4 MPa m 1/2 for 100‐μm layer thickness with 950‐W laser power.…”
Section: Review Of Previous Studies On Crack Growth In 316l Produced mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Riemer and Richard investigated the effects of build‐up rate (cm 3 /h) on the crack growth behaviour of SLM 316L steel. Crack growth testing showed a huge decrease in threshold values, Δ K th , when increasing the build‐up rate: 3.8 MPa m 1/2 for 30‐μm layer thickness with 175‐W laser power to 2.4 MPa m 1/2 for 100‐μm layer thickness with 950‐W laser power.…”
Section: Review Of Previous Studies On Crack Growth In 316l Produced mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, hotter build process results in more ductile microstructure than that of SLM, which is richer in martensite, strong but brittle . Both heat treatment and HIP processes can significantly improve these properties …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,19 In both studies, the authors attributed the inferior fracture toughness in the as-built form to the fine and brittle acicular martensitic structure caused by rapid solidification of the material. In terms of the FCGR, the EBM Ti64 exhibited slower crack growth rates in the Paris law region than that in the wrought condition, in both orientations, 16 whereas FCGR in the SLM Ti64 in the as-built condition was faster in the lower ΔK region (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) and slower in the higher ΔK region (30-80 MPa√m) at load ratio of 0.1. 17 Similar trend was found by another study, 19 in which SLM Ti64 had slower FCGR than the wrought alloy in all three orientations at load ratio 0.1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One area of ongoing investigation concerns the modification of the mechanical properties of additively manufactured elements. Both the layer-by-layer characteristic of the process and the use of process parameters allow for the control of element properties through a variety of methods, including process parameter modification [6,7], heat treatment after selective laser melting (SLM) processing [8,9], element topology [11], and surface treatment [12] after SLM processing [11,12]. A proper surface parameters have a significant influence on elements properties which was deeply investigated by Macek et al in their work [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%