2008
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cracking node method for dynamic fracture with finite elements

Abstract: SUMMARYA new method for modeling discrete cracks based on the extended finite element method is described. In the method, the growth of the actual crack is tracked and approximated with contiguous discrete crack segments that lie on finite element nodes and span only two adjacent elements. The method can deal with complicated fracture patterns because it needs no explicit representation of the topology of the actual crack path. A set of effective rules for injection of crack segments is presented so that fract… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
89
1
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(71 reference statements)
3
89
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to XFEM, no crack path continuity is required in the Cohesive Segment Method. A similar approach was developed by Song and Belytschko [184] in the Cracking Node Method. In the Cracking Node Method, the crack is required to directly pass through the node of an element.…”
Section: Cohesive Segment Methods and Cracking Node Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to XFEM, no crack path continuity is required in the Cohesive Segment Method. A similar approach was developed by Song and Belytschko [184] in the Cracking Node Method. In the Cracking Node Method, the crack is required to directly pass through the node of an element.…”
Section: Cohesive Segment Methods and Cracking Node Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cracking particles method might suffer from spurious crack patterns [236,237]. However, they can be eliminated by a set of simple crack injection rules [184]. Firstly, one has to distinguish between crack propagation and crack initiation.…”
Section: Cracking Particles Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, simply deleting the elements containing branched cracks is just an expedient and the accuracy and feasibility needs to be further demonstrated. A new cracking node method for modeling discrete cracks based on XFEM is also demonstrated with dynamic fracture problems including crack branching by Song et al [26]. In the above all, the branching criterion, crack geometry description and construction of mass matrix for the branched element remain the challenge issues of modeling dynamic crack branching by XFEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different alternatives have been adopted to model crack nucleation and propagation in a dynamic setting. For instance works involving fracture in dynamic problems have been addressed by Falk et al [7], Pandolfi et al [26], Song and Belytschko [35] and Linder and Armero [16], where cracks are inserted between FE (inter-elemental) and inside the FE support (intra-elemental). Other techniques tackle the strain localization phenomena by considering supra-elemental bands such as phase-field modeling [2,11,19] and gradient damage models [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%