2014
DOI: 10.15446/rce.v37n1.44357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cramér-Von Mises Statistic for Repeated Measures

Abstract: The Cramér-von Mises criterion is employed to compare whether the marginal distribution functions of a k-dimensional random variable are equal or not. The well-known Donsker invariance principle and the KarhunenLoéve expansion is used in order to derive its asymptotic distribution. Two different resampling plans (one based on permutations and the other one based on the general bootstrap algorithm, gBA) are also considered to approximate its distribution. The practical behaviour of the proposed test is studied … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the V-Kramer value, a value of 1 indicates perfect relationship and 0 indicates no relationship. The null hypothesis whose value is greater than zero p > 0.05 means that it is a normal distribution and is accepted, while if the value is less than p < 0.05 it indicates non-normality of the distribution and is rejected (Martínez-Camblor et al, 2014). In this study, the indicators indicate normal distribution except for the Y value, 0.001.…”
Section: Note: Compiled By Authorsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…According to the V-Kramer value, a value of 1 indicates perfect relationship and 0 indicates no relationship. The null hypothesis whose value is greater than zero p > 0.05 means that it is a normal distribution and is accepted, while if the value is less than p < 0.05 it indicates non-normality of the distribution and is rejected (Martínez-Camblor et al, 2014). In this study, the indicators indicate normal distribution except for the Y value, 0.001.…”
Section: Note: Compiled By Authorsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Regarding to the nonparametric methods: in the approach proposed by Jensen et al 13 the estimation of a quotient dependent on a smoothed parameter is required in order to approximate the pivotal function distribution, and this directly brings some well-known associated problems with it. 21 The Horva´th et al 14 proposal generates parallel confidence bands which are not usually the most efficient ones, especially in the extremes of the curve, where usually the variability is smaller. The parametric approach has the usual limitation of fixed distribution models assumption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, due to one of the densities appears as denominator, the final obtained estimation could be unstable in those values close to zero. 21 Horváth et al. 14 based their confidence bands on the pivotal function n·{R^(ω,·)-R(·)} and approximated its distribution via bootstrapping.…”
Section: Confidence Bands For the Roc Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiplier method of Rémillard and Scaillet [69] is consistent, but numerically costly and thus practically not applicable to sample sizes of O(1000), as considered in the present work. Martínez-Camblor et al [51] introduced a general bootstrap algorithm leading (under weak assumptions) to a consistent bootstrap statistic when testing for the homogeneity of the marginal distributions of a k-dimensional random variable; Huang and Jing [39] suggested a special bootstrap method for a Cramér-von Mises test for the homogeneity of two distributions, which has a consistent limit distribution. However, these two recent developments are not directly transferable to the problem of testing for the homogeneity of two copulas.…”
Section: Generate B Generalised Bootstrap Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%