2004
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.013441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Craniocervical dystonia questionnaire (CDQ-24): development and validation of a disease-specific quality of life instrument

Abstract: Objective: To develop and test a questionnaire for measuring quality of life in patients with craniocervical dystonia. Methods: A 29-item pool was developed based on semi-structured interviews of patients with cervical dystonia (CD) and blepharospasm (BSP). This preliminary questionnaire was administered to 203 consecutive patients with CD and BSP from Austrian dystonia and botulinum toxin outpatient clinics. For scale generation, a combination of exploratory factor and cluster analysis was applied. This resul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
113
1
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
113
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This instrument addresses the perceptions and concerns of the patients and it can be used to assess the impact of the disease in areas not covered by the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) 8,9 . Even as a generic measure of health status widely adopted to assess QoL 8 , the SF-36 has not been used in this study, since it has undergone a considerable amount of reliability tests and validity studies, proving to be impaired in patients with craniocervical dystonia 9 . The 24 questions of the CDQ-24 are divided in five areas: stigma (6), emotional wellbeing (5), pain (3), activities of daily living (6) and family/social life (4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This instrument addresses the perceptions and concerns of the patients and it can be used to assess the impact of the disease in areas not covered by the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) 8,9 . Even as a generic measure of health status widely adopted to assess QoL 8 , the SF-36 has not been used in this study, since it has undergone a considerable amount of reliability tests and validity studies, proving to be impaired in patients with craniocervical dystonia 9 . The 24 questions of the CDQ-24 are divided in five areas: stigma (6), emotional wellbeing (5), pain (3), activities of daily living (6) and family/social life (4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disease-specific HR-QOL measures have been developed for patients suffering from neuropsychiatric conditions bearing similarities to GTS, including cervical dystonia [50] and hemifacial spasm [51]. However, until recently, there has been no tool to measure GTS-specific HR-QOL.…”
Section: The Gts-qol: a Disease-specific Hr-qol Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Scale, Unified Dystonia Rating Scale, and Global Dystonia Rating Scale were developed to evaluate generalized dystonia, but are also used for other dystonia types [44,46]. The Tsui score [47], the Cervical Dystonia Severity Scale [48], the Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile [49], the Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire [50], and the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale [51] have been developed for cervical dystonia; the Jankovic Rating Scale [52] is used for blepharospasm. These scales vary in their ease of use in the clinical setting and appropriateness for use in clinical trials [45].…”
Section: Trial Design Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%