2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-010-0089-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Craniofacial variables in subjects with and without habitual snoring: A cephalometric comparison

Abstract: Snoring subjects appear to present craniofacial factors that differ from those of non-snoring subjects, and we suggest obtaining cephalogram for diagnosis and following up of them.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The hypernasality of two patients (8%) was also immeasurable. Post-operative hyponasality was only seen in one patient (8). As mentioned, the outbreak of severe hypernasality in our study was only about 12% whereas it was 5.37% in the study by Derakhshan et al Moreover, in our research hypernasality was completely treated or turned into mild hypernasality in about 87% of patients while in the study by Fatemeh Derakhshan hypernasality was treated or mitigated to mild hypernasality in about 55% of patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…The hypernasality of two patients (8%) was also immeasurable. Post-operative hyponasality was only seen in one patient (8). As mentioned, the outbreak of severe hypernasality in our study was only about 12% whereas it was 5.37% in the study by Derakhshan et al Moreover, in our research hypernasality was completely treated or turned into mild hypernasality in about 87% of patients while in the study by Fatemeh Derakhshan hypernasality was treated or mitigated to mild hypernasality in about 55% of patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 42%