1981
DOI: 10.1177/004051758105101110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crease-Recovery and Tensile-Strength Properties of Unmodified and Modified Cotton Cellulose Treated with Crosslinking Agents

Abstract: Cotton fabrics were oxidized with nitrogen dioxide and sodium periodate and crosslinked with dimethylol urea (DMU) and with dimethylol dihydroxy ethylene urea (DMDHEU) by the pad-dry-cure process. The effect of pre- and post-oxidation to resin treatment on the crease-resistance and tensile properties of cotton fabrics have been investigated. The results show that crease-recovery angle increases with degree of oxidation, and further periodate oxidation causes the release of strain in cellulose structure, thereb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of easy care finishes can be assessed by the British Standards crease recovery angle test method and should provide a sensitive indicator of fibre cross-linking and associated crease resist finish concentration on the fibre (Weilin and Shyr 2000;Grant et al 1966;Hassenboflfr et al 1971;Murphy et al 1968;Shet and Yabani 1981;Chen and Chen 2001;Hashem et al 2003). Other wet chemical methods that have been proposed to monitor the fibre bulk easy care finish concentration are based on Kjedahl analysis of nitrogen content (Ibrahim et al 2008;Soignet et al 1976), titrimetry (Xu and Shyr 2001) and Leuco HCN Analysis (Hashem et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of easy care finishes can be assessed by the British Standards crease recovery angle test method and should provide a sensitive indicator of fibre cross-linking and associated crease resist finish concentration on the fibre (Weilin and Shyr 2000;Grant et al 1966;Hassenboflfr et al 1971;Murphy et al 1968;Shet and Yabani 1981;Chen and Chen 2001;Hashem et al 2003). Other wet chemical methods that have been proposed to monitor the fibre bulk easy care finish concentration are based on Kjedahl analysis of nitrogen content (Ibrahim et al 2008;Soignet et al 1976), titrimetry (Xu and Shyr 2001) and Leuco HCN Analysis (Hashem et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tensile strength: When warp direction tensile strength is examined, the difference of C1 and C2 result is pretty close to each other, extension also almost same for both of recipes. Crease recovery finish application due to crosslinking agent decreases the tensile strength 11 results when comparing with untreated fabric samples. Tensile strength results in warp direction are decreased nearly 51% for C1 recipe, 53% for C2 recipe.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The tensile strength test of esterified polyester/cotton blend fabric before and after treatment was done according to the ASTM D5034-textile grab method test using Tensolab 100. When the specimen broke, the braking force and elongation were noted [26,27].…”
Section: Tensile Strength Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%