2017
DOI: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creatine Kinase and Lactate Dehydrogenase Responses After Different Resistance and Aerobic Exercise Protocols

Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the responses of creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) after performing different resistance and aerobic exercise protocols. Twelve recreationally trained men (age, 23.2 ± 5.6 years; body mass, 84.3 ± 9.3 kg; body height, 178.9 ± 4.5 cm; and BMI, 26.3 ± 2.3 kg·m2) volunteered to participate in this study. All subjects were randomly assigned to four experimental protocols (crossover): (a) aerobic training at 60% of VO2max, (b) aerobic training at 80% of VO… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
54
2
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
11
54
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We have also looked at the post-exercise changes of muscle damage markers and we found a small non-significant numerical increase in these markers during the recovery from exercise. Even small changes in creatine kinase activity during exercise seem to confirm the effect of exercise on the integrity of muscle cells, which is consistent with earlier studies performed by other authors but in different populations and different experimental conditions [30,31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We have also looked at the post-exercise changes of muscle damage markers and we found a small non-significant numerical increase in these markers during the recovery from exercise. Even small changes in creatine kinase activity during exercise seem to confirm the effect of exercise on the integrity of muscle cells, which is consistent with earlier studies performed by other authors but in different populations and different experimental conditions [30,31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This clinical variable could be good diagnostic marker for the evaluation of physical fitness and condition of athletes as well (Nowak, Buryta, Kostrzewa-Nowak, 2016). P. Proia, A. Amato, V. Contró, D. Thiel, P. Vostatková, B. Buryta, M. Kolbowicz, T. Lewandowski, A. Nowakowska CK is frequently described as the best indirect marker of damage of muscle tissue, especially after resistance exercise (Callegari et al, 2017). In our investigation, CK and LDH activity were at the very high levels in the postexercise period of time, considerably exceeding the reference values established for general population.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…There was no change in the other biomarkers of muscle damage (lactate dehydrogenase) or inflammation (high sensitivity C-reactive protein and interleukin-10 and 6) following the leg press exercise. The responses of lactate dehydrogenase [21,22], C-reactive protein [23], and interleukin-10 [24] to resistance exercise are variable. Interleukin-6 usually increases after resistance exercise, but it may be that the volume of the leg press exercise was too little to see any changes in this biomarker [23].…”
Section: Leg Press Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%