Creating a large-scale CO2 infrastructure for enhanced oil recovery

Berger, B.; Kaarstad, Olav; Haugen, Hans Aksel

doi:10.1016/b978-008044704-9/50033-1

Cited by 12 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Since CO 2 is more non-hazardous fluid than LNG, less or equal margin is enough for buffer volume of temporary storage. 120% of ship capacity was considered in this study, which provided more operational margins than CO 2 storage assumed by ZEP (2011) and more cost-effectiveness than CO2 storage assumed by Barrio et al (2004) or Berger et al (2004).…”

Section: Liquefaction Process For Casementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The size of the temporary storage, which was expressed as buffer storage by ZEP (2011), was 100% of ship size. Barrio et al (2004) and Berger et al (2004) assumed the capacity of temporary storage was 150% of the ship capacity. Bliault et al (2000) assumed the capacity of floating LNG storage was about 118-148% of LNG carrier capacity to have operational margins.…”

Section: Liquefaction Process For Casementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development of CO2 terminal and CO2 carrier for future commercialized CCS market

Yoo

Choi

Kim

et al. 2013

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Liquefaction Process For Casementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Liquefaction Process For Casementioning

confidence: 99%

Development of CO2 terminal and CO2 carrier for future commercialized CCS market

Yoo

Choi

Kim

et al. 2013

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In 2003-2004, Statoil (now Equinor) undertook studies of CO 2 -EOR for the Gullfaks Field [21][22][23]. It was assumed that 5 Mt CO 2 /year would be available for 10 years, which would give an increased oil production of 18.3 Sm 3 relative to water injection, or 4.1% of oil in place.…”

Section: A Norwegian Casementioning

confidence: 99%

Enabling Large-Scale Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage (CCUS) Using Offshore Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Infrastructure Developments—A Review

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Presently, the only offshore project for enhanced oil recovery using carbon dioxide, known as CO2-EOR, is in Brazil. Several desk studies have been undertaken, without any projects being implemented. The objective of this review is to investigate barriers to the implementation of large-scale offshore CO2-EOR projects, to identify recent technology developments, and to suggest non-technological incentives that may enable implementation. We examine differences between onshore and offshore CO2-EOR, emerging technologies that could enable projects, as well as approaches and regulatory requirements that may help overcome barriers. Our review shows that there are few, if any, technical barriers to offshore CO2-EOR. However, there are many other barriers to the implementation of offshore CO2-EOR, including: High investment and operation costs, uncertainties about reservoir performance, limited access of CO2 supply, lack of business models, and uncertainties about regulations. This review describes recent technology developments that may remove such barriers and concludes with recommendations for overcoming non-technical barriers. The review is based on a report by the Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (CSLF).

show abstract

“…However, it would be possible to use a ship to transport CO 2 to a sequestration site offshore [14] and this might be desirable for enhanced oil recovery operations because it would allow the CO 2 supply to the offshore installation to be intermittent. CO 2 transmission pipelines already exist in the USA.…”

Section: Transport Of Comentioning

confidence: 99%

Sequestration — The Underground Storage of Carbon Dioxide

Holloway

2008

Alliance for Global Sustainability BookSeries

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Underground storage of industrial quantities of carbon dioxide in porous and permeable reservoir rocks has been taking place for the last 11 years at the Sleipner West gas field in the North Sea. A further commercial-scale CO 2 storage project has recently begun at In Salah, Algeria, and the Snohvit field, Barents Sea, is to begin injecting CO 2 underground in late 2007 or early 2008. A monitored CO 2 -EOR project is underway at Weyburn, Canada and research scale injection projects have been undertaken at Nagaoka (Japan), Frio (USA) and K12-B (offshore Netherlands). This demonstrates that CO 2 can be successfully injected into underground storage reservoirs on a large scale. Natural analogues (natural fields of CO 2 and other buoyant fluids) demonstrate that under favourable conditions gases can be retained in the subsurface for millions of years. Although there is still very significant uncertainty in the actual figures, it appears that globally there is enough underground storage capacity for CO 2 storage technology to make a significant impact on global emissions to the atmosphere. Some other major issues that must be addressed if this technology is to spread to power stations, and thus make a significant impact on global CO 2 emissions, are the cost of CO 2 capture, further demonstrations of safe and secure storage and public acceptance that long-term storage will be successful.

show abstract

Creating a large-scale CO2 infrastructure for enhanced oil recovery

Cited by 12 publications

References 4 publications

Development of CO2 terminal and CO2 carrier for future commercialized CCS market

Development of CO2 terminal and CO2 carrier for future commercialized CCS market

Enabling Large-Scale Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage (CCUS) Using Offshore Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Infrastructure Developments—A Review

Sequestration — The Underground Storage of Carbon Dioxide

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About